Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Employing Digital Droplet PCR to Detect BRAF V600E Mutations in Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Reference Standard Cell Lines
Published on: October 8, 2015
Real-world safety of voretigene neparvovec: a disproportionality analysis for signal detection using the FAERS
Pengyue Zhao1, Yaping Gao1, Haijiang Qiu2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract:
This study aims to evaluate the post-marketing safety profile of voretigene neparvovec using a large spontaneous reporting database. This is a. retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality study. Adverse event (AE) reports for voretigene neparvovec were retrieved from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), Q1 2019-Q1 2025. Disproportionality was assessed using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). Signals were summarized at the System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) levels. A total of 128 AE reports were included. The median patient age was 18 years, with adolescents and young adults comprising the majority. The primary sources of reports were physicians (44.53%) and consumers (43.75%), with intraocular injection being the most frequently reported route of administration (25.00%). Signal analysis revealed that ocular disorders had the highest number of reports and the most prominent signal strength (e.g., retinal degeneration: ROR = 3742.02, IC025 = 6.93; retinal depigmentation: ROR = 8865.67, IC025 = 8.37). Other significant signals included vitreous floaters (ROR = 1497.43, IC025 = 5.43) and elevated intraocular pressure (ROR = 473.10, IC025 = 4.37). In contrast, systemic events such as headache and ocular pain showed weaker signals that did not exceed the statistical significance threshold. In real-world use, voretigene neparvovec is mainly associated with ocular AEs linked to surgical delivery and local inflammatory responses, notably structural retinal changes and intraocular pressure elevations. These findings support careful preoperative assessment, optimized perioperative technique, and close postoperative monitoring. FAERS-based signals indicate association rather than causality and should be interpreted alongside prospective data. Clinical trial number is not applicable.
More Related Videos
05:45Developmental Toxicity Assay Based on Real-Time Monitoring of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Disruption in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published on: October 10, 2025
12:22The Use of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays RPPA to Explore Protein Expression Variation within Individual Renal Cell Cancers
Published on: January 22, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Relative Risk
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Teratogenicity