Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Standing Neurophysiological Assessment of Lower Extremity Muscles Post-Stroke
Published on: July 26, 2021
Outcome Measure Frequency in Stroke Rehabilitation Lower Extremity Randomized Controlled Trials and Its Correlation
Robert Teasell1, Cecilia Flores-Sandoval2, Sarvenaz Mehrabi2
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario; Lawson Research Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario.
Outcome measure use in lower extremity stroke rehabilitation trials is highly varied, hindering intervention comparisons despite guideline recommendations. This heterogeneity persists despite efforts to standardize measures over the past decade.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Stroke frequently causes lower extremity (LE) motor dysfunction.
- Standardized outcome measures (OMs) are crucial for evaluating rehabilitation interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) provides a framework for categorizing OMs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the frequency of OMs used in LE post-stroke rehabilitation RCTs.
- To categorize these OMs according to the ICF framework.
- To assess the correlation between OM usage and current research/clinical practice recommendations.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature searches were conducted across major databases (Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) up to December 2024.
- Included were English-language RCTs evaluating LE motor rehabilitation interventions in adults.
- Data extraction and screening were performed by two independent reviewers using Covidence, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
Main Results:
- 1,548 RCTs yielded 339 unique OMs, categorized under ICF: body structures/function (n=112), activities (n=161), and participation (n=66).
- Top OMs included Berg Balance Scale (31.5%), 10-Metre Walk Test (28.2%), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (23.1%).
- OM utilization partially aligns with guidelines (e.g., Fugl-Meyer Assessment in 10/12 guidelines), but some recommended OMs are rarely used.
Conclusions:
- Significant heterogeneity exists in OM selection for LE stroke rehabilitation RCTs.
- This variability may impede meaningful comparisons between different rehabilitation interventions.
- Despite recommendations for standardization, heterogeneity in OMs persists, potentially limiting clinical translation.
More Related Videos
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024
05:25Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS
Published on: June 7, 2024