Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.0K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

17.0K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
17.0K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.8K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.8K
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

793
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
793

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Within-alternative processing supports transitivity of preferences in multiattribute choice.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

The role of attention in multi attribute decision making.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Social cues for experimenter incompetence influence choice blindness.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

The confidence-noise confidence-boost (CNCB) model of confidence rating data.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Valence in perception: Are affective valence and visual brightness integral dimensions in visual experience?

Consciousness and cognition·2024
Same author

A common factor underlying individual differences in confirmation bias.

Scientific reports·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Contrasting holistic-compensatory with probabilistic heuristic strategies in multi-attribute decisions.

Gal Atun1, Vincent de Gardelle2,3, Marius Usher4

  • 1School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Haim Levanon 55, Tel Aviv, Israel. galatun1@gmail.com.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|February 27, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study tested a new probabilistic decision-making model (Single Probabilistic Attribute - SPA) against existing strategies. Findings suggest most people use fast, compensatory decision-making, favoring the weighted-average model over simpler heuristics.

Keywords:
Choice RTComputational modelingDecision-polarizationSelective samplingTTB heuristicsWeighted-average

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Traditional views suggested humans use simplified strategies (e.g., Take The Best - TTB) under time pressure in multi-attribute decision-making.
  • Recent research challenges this, proposing more complex strategies may be employed even with limited information.
  • The study investigates a probabilistic extension of TTB, the Single Probabilistic Attribute (SPA) model, as an alternative heuristic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the validity of the Single Probabilistic Attribute (SPA) model against existing decision-making models, including TTB and the normative weighted-average (WAV) model.
  • To differentiate between heuristic (SPA/gTTB) and compensatory (WAV) models using decision times.
  • To analyze individual differences in decision strategies under speeded conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Computational comparison of SPA, gTTB, and WAV models using choice data.
  • Empirical data collection via a speeded multi-attribute decision task with varying numbers of numerical attributes (3, 4, 5).
  • Analysis of decision times and choice patterns from 117 participants across two experiments.

Main Results:

  • The SPA model showed comparable or better fit than gTTB for 3-5 attributes.
  • Decision time analysis provided strong evidence against the SPA model.
  • The majority of participants (70%) exhibited choices consistent with the compensatory weighted-average (WAV) model, making fast decisions (<1.5s).

Conclusions:

  • Contrary to some prior research, findings suggest that under open-view, speeded conditions, most individuals employ fast, compensatory decision-making strategies (WAV).
  • A significant portion of participants (approx. 30%) did utilize TTB-like strategies.
  • Decision time is a crucial differentiator, supporting normative models over simpler heuristic accounts in this context.