Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

07:27
Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
Published on: February 7, 2025
1.2K
Does Robotic Surgery Offer Advantages Over Thoracoscopic Surgery for Patients Undergoing Wedge Resection for
Grace Ha1, Lesley Coe1, Rajika Jindani1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10467, United States.
Summary
Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for lung wedge resection yields more lymph nodes, potentially improving survival. However, differences in surgical outcomes and mortality were not significant compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
Area of Science:
- Thoracic Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) are standard minimally invasive techniques for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- The benefits of RATS for simple wedge resections, compared to VATS, remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes between RATS and VATS for minimally invasive wedge resection in clinical stage IA NSCLC patients.
- To evaluate the impact of lymph node yield on survival following wedge resection.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010-2022.
- Inclusion of patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC undergoing minimally invasive wedge resection.
- Comparison of outcomes between RATS and VATS, including lymph node yield, nodal upstaging, adjuvant therapy, surgical margins, length of stay, readmissions, and mortality.
Main Results:
- RATS (26.8%) was associated with significantly higher lymph node yield compared to VATS (73.2%).
- RATS showed higher odds of nodal upstaging and increased delivery of adjuvant therapy.
- No significant differences were found in surgical margins, length of stay, readmissions, or short-term mortality between RATS and VATS.
- Increased lymph node sampling was linked to a slight improvement in 5-year overall survival.
Conclusions:
- Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for wedge resection increases lymph node yield, potentially contributing to improved overall survival.
- While RATS demonstrated benefits in lymph node sampling and nodal upstaging, overall survival improvements were modest.
- Further research is needed to distinguish the specific contributions of RATS adoption versus general advancements in oncologic care and to assess cost-effectiveness.

