Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026
![Technical Aspect of the Automated Synthesis and Real-Time Kinetic Evaluation of [11C]SNAP-7941](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F59557.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
09:50
Technical Aspect of the Automated Synthesis and Real-Time Kinetic Evaluation of [11C]SNAP-7941
Published on: April 28, 2019
8.1K
A methodology for accurate benchmarking of neural network accelerators using a high-level synthesis-based hardware
Kartik Prabhu1, Jeffrey Yu1, Xinyuan Allen Pan1
1Stanford University , Stanford, CA, USA.
Summary
Benchmarking neural network accelerators is challenging due to varying designs. We introduce Voyager, a tool for fair comparisons of hardware accelerators by creating matched baseline designs for systematic evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Computer Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence Hardware
Background:
- Neural network models are increasing in complexity, driving demand for specialized hardware accelerators.
- Existing evaluation metrics (e.g., TOPS, TOPS/W) are insufficient for fair comparisons due to external factors like technology node and workload variations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a standardized methodology for benchmarking neural network accelerators.
- To enable fair, apples-to-apples comparisons across diverse accelerator architectures.
Main Methods:
- Developed Voyager, a high-level synthesis (HLS)-based accelerator generator.
- Created baseline accelerators with matched compute scale and technology nodes.
- Ran identical workloads on generated accelerators for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- Voyager enables the creation of well-optimized baseline accelerators.
- The methodology facilitates systematic evaluation of accelerator architectures.
- Case studies demonstrated effective comparisons across different accelerator types, including in-memory and sparsity-aware designs.
Conclusions:
- The proposed benchmarking methodology using Voyager provides a robust framework for evaluating neural network accelerators.
- This approach allows for isolation of architectural impacts, leading to more meaningful analysis and design insights.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...