Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026
Using Continuous Data Tracking Technology to Study Exercise Adherence in Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Published on: November 8, 2013
Added Technology for Weight Management in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Biopsychosocial Factors and Rehabilitees' Talk in a
Heli Lahtio1,2, Teemu Paajanen3, Hilkka Korpi1,4
1Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Background:
Hardly any previous studies have examined technology-based interventions among cardiac rehabilitees. The added value of technology and biopsychosocial factors in weight management should be studied more in cardiac rehabilitation.
Objective:
This mixed method study aimed to examine what biopsychosocial factors predict WC reduction and what factors arise from the talk of cardiac rehabilitees during 12-month cardiac rehabilitation.
Methods:
A total of 59 rehabilitees (mean age 60, SD 6 years; 48/59, 81.3% male) were randomly assigned in pairs into the experimental group (n=29) or the reference group (n=30). Biopsychosocial outcomes were measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months with a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Form questionnaire, body mass, BMI, WC, age, and sex. Rehabilitees' experiences were investigated using focus group interviews. Both groups received conventional cardiac rehabilitation. In addition, the experimental group used technology. Multiple linear regression was used to predict WC change in 0-6 months and 0-12 months. The qualitative data were analyzed with thematic analysis. Integrative analysis was used to create a research-based model.
Results:
Group allocation predicted WC reduction (P=.007), with the experimental group showing a greater reduction (b=2.5 cm) than the reference group in the 0-6 month analysis. A significant interaction between the reference group and 6MWT was observed (P=.04), meaning that improvement in 6MWT was associated with WC reduction. Baseline WC was marginally associated with a greater reduction in WC (P=.05). None of the independent variables predicted WC reduction in 0- to 12-month analyses. Three themes arose from the interviews with the experimental group: meaningful factors related to weight management, a goal-oriented approach to weight loss, and monitoring body composition. Two themes emerged from the reference group: motivation for change and unstable weight management. According to the integrative analysis, belonging to the experimental group was important. The research-based model highlighted that the added value of remote technology on WC reduction was largest at the beginning of rehabilitation (0-6 months). The rehabilitees' talk in the experimental group was goal-oriented, and they talked about the achieved changes. In the reference group, the talk remained motivational, and their body composition changes were unstable.
Conclusions:
The integrative model emphasizes the differences between the experimental and reference groups in weight management. The use of added remote technology seemed to explain the WC reduction. The rehabilitees reflected on behavioral changes in weight management. In the reference group, improved 6MWT distance was associated with decreased WC, but they talked about motivation for weight management and unstable changes in body composition. In the future, results should be verified by larger research groups and individual interviews, which can be combined with personal quantitative data.
Trial Registration:
ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN61225589; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61225589.
