Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion PHP with Melphalan as a Treatment for Unresectable Metastases Confined to the Liver
Published on: July 31, 2016
Patient-Reported Financial Toxicity of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Vladislav Kovalik1, Armando Sardi2, Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga1
1Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Financial toxicity (FT) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL) for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) patients. Financial well-being improves one year after treatment, but risk factors like chemotherapy and co-pays persist.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Economics
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a complex treatment associated with potential financial toxicity (FT).
- FT can negatively affect the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors.
- Understanding the drivers and trajectory of FT is crucial for supportive care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess financial toxicity (FT) in candidates and survivors of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC).
- To investigate the association between FT and quality of life (QoL).
- To explore the dynamics and contributing factors of FT over time.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 248 participants (candidates and survivors) undergoing CRS/HIPEC.
- Utilized the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) surveys.
- Employed Spearman correlation and generalized linear models to analyze FT, QoL, and risk factors.
Main Results:
- 31% of participants experienced moderate-to-severe financial toxicity (FT).
- A strong correlation was found between FT (COST scores) and QoL (FACT-G scores) (rho = 0.51, p < 0.001).
- Risk factors for increased FT included perioperative chemotherapy, identifying as a person of color, being single, and higher co-pays; FT decreased significantly by one year post-treatment.
Conclusions:
- Financial toxicity (FT) is a significant concern for CRS/HIPEC patients, strongly linked to poorer quality of life (QoL).
- Perioperative chemotherapy, co-pays, and sociodemographic factors are key drivers of FT.
- Patients' financial well-being shows improvement within one year following CRS/HIPEC.
More Related Videos
04:48Chemotherapy-induced Vascular Toxicity - Real-time In vivo Imaging of Vessel Impairment
Published on: January 7, 2015
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...