Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing
Published on: September 25, 2011
Timing Intervals and Frequency of Adenoma Surveillance Colonoscopies in Central Queensland, Australia
Yiu Ming Ho1,2, Katharina M D Merollini3,4,5, Louisa G Collins6,7,8
1Department of Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Introduction:
The presence of colonic adenomatous polyps is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Australian Guidelines changed in 2019 so that the surveillance colonoscopy intervals and polyp risk stratification were changed to reflect evidence available. The purpose of this research was to understand compliance with the Guidelines and implications for the health system.
Methods:
Using routine hospital administrative datasets, all polyp surveillance colonoscopies performed from January 2018 to September 2020 in three government-funded hospitals in Central Queensland, Australia, were analysed. Colonoscopy intervals were calculated and compared with national recommendations. 'Early surveillance' was defined as greater than 6 months earlier than recommended. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess early surveillance or not, adjusted for potential confounding. Interval cancer and adenoma detection rates were also examined.
Results:
Surveillance colonoscopies were performed for 294 patients with low-risk polyps, 20 with intermediate-risk polyps, 321 with high-risk polyps and 12 with very high-risk polyps during the study period (total n = 647). Early surveillance occurred in 566 (87.5%). The overall interval cancer rate was 0.9% (6/647), and adenoma detection rates were 62.2% (357/574) before the change of guidelines and 79.1% (53/67) after the change. No examined demographic or clinical factors were associated with early surveillance.
Conclusion:
Despite outstanding and high-quality colonoscopy services being provided, higher than recommended colonoscopy surveillance was identified in the regional public hospitals in Central Queensland. Hospital processes should be improved to ensure appropriate intervals between procedures to avoid using scarce healthcare resources.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:

