Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing
Published on: February 13, 2018
ICP-WAVES: Intracranial Pressure Waveform Analysis and Visualization for Enhanced Signal Processing
Objective:
Intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform morphology reflects brain compliance and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Existing monitoring methods fail to fully capture complex temporal patterns nor enable real-time interactive analysis to improve clinical decision-making.
Methods:
We trained a transformer-based foundation model to capture temporal dynamics and generate embeddings from physiological data. The model was fine-tuned on physiological waveform data from patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) admitted to Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) and validated on two non-overlapping datasets: a) patients with cerebral external ventricular drainage (EVD) at CUIMC and b) a synthetic ICP dataset. The embeddings generated from the foundation model were used to train a support vector machine (SVM) classifier to classify different morphologies. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and confusion matrices, by splitting the dataset into training and testing. We developed a graphical user interface to enable ad-hoc analysis, fine-tune models, and visualize ICP trends.
Results:
A total of 190 patients between March 2009 and August 2013 with ICH were included to fine-tune the foundation model with a median length of stay (LOS) of 5 [4-9.25] days, and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 11 [7-15]. 6s2 of these patients had ICP waveform data. A total of 23 other patients (train: 11, test 12) from January 2021 to August 2023 with EVD were used to train the SVM model to classify different ICP morphologies; with median LOS 17 [12-23] days, and GCS 7 [5 13]. Two trained experts (YL, GG) labeled 8406 ICP (train:3613, test: 4793) pulses. The model achieved AUCs of 0.90 for 3-peak compliant, 0.93 for single-peak non-compliant, and 0.78 for multi peak non-compliant waveforms. On simulated ICP data, the AUCs were 1.00 for all the waveform classes. However, the confusion matrix analysis revealed that 1-peak compliant waveforms were classified with 77.5% accuracy while all other categories had 100% accuracy.
Conclusion:
A deep learning-based foundation model optimized for analyzing invasive ICP waveforms can extract clinically relevant information about cerebral compliance. The performance was best for distinguishing compliant from non-compliant waveforms.
Related Concept Videos
Wave Parameters
Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS): Overview
Sound as Pressure Waves
The pressure fluctuation depends on the difference in displacements between the successive points in the...
Intensity and Pressure of Sound Waves
Unlike the time average of a sinusoidal term, which is zero since it is positive and...
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
Convolution Properties II
The width property indicates that if the durations of input signals are T1 and T2, then the width of the output response equals the sum of both durations, irrespective of the shapes of the two functions. For instance, convolving two rectangular pulses with durations of 2 seconds and 1 second results in a function with a width of 3 seconds.
The area property asserts that the area under the...

