Relationship Between Age and Performance of Police Tactical Group Candidates and Officers Completing an...

Police Tactical Group (PTG) officers, in general, are older than their general duties counterparts. The nature of the occupational role scope demands a high level of fitness; thus, physical assessments are essential. This research investigated the relationship between officer age and completion times for an occupationally relevant physical fitness assessment in specialist police officers.

Retrospective data were collected from 34 male PTG officers (age 37.8 [SD 6.5] y); height 181.6 [SD 6.7] cm; body mass 91.5 [SD 10.9] kg) and 18 male PTG candidates (age 32.1 [SD 5.0] y; height 183.7 [SD 5.8] cm; body mass 89.4 [SD 8.7] kg) competing in the RUSH assessment. The RUSH consisted of alternating directional sprints, crawls, 80kg mannequin drags (10-20m), and adopting shooting positions. Operational personal protective equipment (PPE; 22.2 [SD 4.90] kg) was worn.

PTG officers were significantly older (P=.002) and carried significantly lighter PPE loads (P<.001). There were no significant differences in mean RUSH times between PTG officers (105.1 seconds [SD 14.6s]) and candidates (111.7 (SD 9.2) s, P=.056). Correlations and a backward stepwise regression model were consistent in indicating that neither age nor group was a statistically significant predictor of RUSH time. PPE weight was not significantly predictive of RUSH time when entered alone in a regression model.

Age was not a significant predictor of RUSH times; as such, the RUSH can be used for initial candidates and for older qualified personnel. Ongoing physical strength and conditioning practices undertaken by PTG officers may mitigate age-related fitness loss.