The Clinical Utility of Sequence-Based Genetic Testing for Fetal Edema Following Non-Diagnostic Microarray Results: A
Victoria M Allen1,2, Heleen H Arts1,2, Erica Schollenberg1,2
1Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Prenatal Diagnosis
|March 3, 2026
Summary
Further genetic sequencing after non-diagnostic microarray testing for fetal edema identified genetic disorders in 34% of cases. RASopathy panel sequencing is recommended for increased nuchal translucency or cystic hygroma.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Fetal Medicine
Background:
- Fetal edema identified via ultrasound can indicate underlying genetic disorders.
- Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a primary genetic test, but may not yield a diagnosis in all cases of fetal edema.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the frequency and diagnostic yield of further genetic sequencing in fetuses with edema after a non-diagnostic CMA.
- To evaluate the utility of targeted gene panels and exome sequencing in this specific population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 114 cases with fetal edema and non-diagnostic CMA results from 2014-2022.
- Analysis of genetic testing utilization (targeted genes, panels, exomes) following multidisciplinary review.
- Descriptive analysis to determine diagnostic yields based on specific ultrasound findings and testing types.
Main Results:
- Genetic diagnoses were achieved in 17 (34%) of the 114 cases.
- RASopathy testing yielded 18.5% diagnostic rate, while exome sequencing achieved 41.2%.
- Highest diagnostic yields were observed in cases with fetal hydrops and isolated fetal edema.
Conclusions:
- Targeted sequencing, particularly RASopathy panels, offers significant diagnostic yield for fetal edema with increased nuchal translucency or cystic hygroma, and should be considered standard care alongside CMA.
- Multidisciplinary review and correlation of prenatal/postnatal findings are crucial for guiding further testing, genetic counseling, and management, especially in non-immune fetal hydrops.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
DNA Microarrays
Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...


