Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Prognostic impact of myocardial bridge on long-term mortality and morbidity: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Yasir Salah Alam1, Hussein Nafakhi2,3, Liwaa Mahdi4
1Department of Internal medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa, P.O. Box 21, Kufa, Iraq.
Insights
Myocardial bridges (MB) are linked to major adverse cardiac events (MACE), but not all-cause or cardiovascular death. Diagnostic methods and patient risk factors influence this association, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of MB in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- The clinical significance of myocardial bridges (MB) is debated due to inconsistent reporting.
- Variations in patient populations and diagnostic techniques complicate MB's relevance.
- This study addresses the uncertainty surrounding MB's association with long-term health outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the relationship between myocardial bridges (MB) and long-term mortality and morbidity.
- To analyze the impact of different diagnostic methods and patient subgroups on MB's clinical relevance.
- To clarify the association of MB with all-cause death (ACD), cardiovascular death (CVD), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature review was performed, including studies published up to December 2024.
- The search focused on studies investigating the link between MB and adverse cardiac outcomes (ACD, CVD, MACE).
- Meta-analysis and subgroup analyses were conducted to pool data and explore heterogeneity.
Main Results:
- 22 studies with 37,940 participants were analyzed.
- Myocardial bridges (MB) showed no significant association with all-cause death (ACD) or cardiovascular death (CVD).
- MB was significantly associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (HR: 1.958).
- Conventional coronary angiography detected MB linked to higher MACE risk (HR: 1.992), unlike multi-detector computed tomography.
- In high-risk groups (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, high-risk CAD), MB significantly increased MACE risk (HRs: 2.174 and 3.435, respectively).
Conclusions:
- Myocardial bridges (MB) are associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
- No significant association was found between MB and isolated all-cause death (ACD) or cardiovascular death (CVD).
- Diagnostic method and patient risk profile are critical factors in assessing MB's clinical impact.
Background:
The clinical relevance of myocardial bridge (MB) remains uncertain and inconsistently reported across studies. This study aimed to assess the relationship between MB and long-term mortality and morbidity, while accounting for the influence of varying patient populations and diagnostic methods used to detect MB.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies published up to December 2024 that examined the association between MB and adverse outcomes, including all-cause death (ACD), cardiovascular death (CVD), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Results:
A total of 22 studies involving 37,940 participants were included in the analysis. MB was not significantly associated with an increased risk of ACD or CVD. However, MB showed a significant association with MACE, with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 1.958 (95% CI: 1.490-2.572; P < 0.001) across 19 studies. Subgroup analysis indicated that MB identified through conventional coronary angiography was significantly linked to a higher risk of MACE (pooled HR: 1.992; 95% CI: 1.432-2.772; P < 0.001), whereas MB detected using multi-detector computed tomography did not show a statistically significant association with MACE. Among high-risk groups, such as patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and those with high-risk coronary artery disease, MB was associated with a notably increased risk of MACE, with pooled HRs of 2.174 (95% CI: 1.067-4.426; P = 0.032) and 3.435 (95% CI: 1.732-6.810; P < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusions:
MB was associated with an increased relative risk of MACE in pooled analyses but showed no significant association with isolated ACD or CVD.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

