Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Rose Bengal Photothrombosis by Confocal Optical Imaging In Vivo: A Model of Single Vessel Stroke
Published on: June 23, 2015
The ROSE framework for fluid therapy in critically ill pediatric patients
Romina Aparecida Dos Santos Gomes1,2, Manu L N G Malbrain3,4,5, Adriana Teixeira Rodrigues1,2
1Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Insights
The ROSE framework is applicable for pediatric fluid management, showing feasibility and potential for individualizing care. While fluid accumulation was similar, adherence improved post-training.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Fluid Management Strategies
- Clinical Framework Implementation
Background:
- Critically ill children often experience fluid overload, impacting outcomes.
- The Resuscitation, Optimization, Stabilization, Evacuation (ROSE) framework offers a structured approach to fluid therapy.
- Assessing the ROSE framework's applicability in pediatric intensive care is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and impact of the ROSE framework on fluid management in critically ill pediatric patients.
- To assess the framework's effectiveness in preventing fluid accumulation and improving clinical outcomes.
- To benchmark fluid accumulation percentages (FA%) across different phases of the ROSE framework.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental study comparing retrospective and prospective cohorts (n=122) of mechanically ventilated, vasoactive-dependent children.
- Implementation of structured training on ROSE-guided fluid management for the prospective cohort.
- Outcomes measured included fluid accumulation percentage (FA%), mechanical ventilation duration, PICU length of stay, and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT).
Main Results:
- Fluid accumulation percentage (FA%) remained similar between retrospective and prospective cohorts across multiple time points.
- FA% was comparable during Resuscitation, Optimization, and Evacuation phases, but higher during Stabilization in the prospective cohort.
- Adherence to FA% targets increased from 67.9% to 72.4% after ROSE framework implementation; other clinical outcomes were similar.
Conclusions:
- The ROSE framework is a feasible approach for managing fluid therapy in critically ill pediatric patients.
- It provides valuable benchmarking for controlling fluid accumulation and shows promise for personalized fluid management.
- Further validation in centers not previously exposed to the ROSE framework is recommended.
Introduction:
The study aimed to assess the applicability of the ROSE conceptual framework (Resuscitation, Optimization, Stabilization, Evacuation) for fluid therapy in critically ill pediatric patients, focusing on its distinct phases, prevention of fluid accumulation, and clinical outcomes.
Material And Methods:
A quasi-experimental study was conducted including 122 (retrospective: n = 71; prospective: n = 51) mechanically ventilated and vasoactive-dependent children. A retrospective cohort was compared with a prospective cohort following structured training on ROSE-guided fluid management. Outcomes included fluid accumulation percentage (FA%), duration of mechanical ventilation, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) length of stay, and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Adherence to phase-specific FA% targets was also assessed.
Results:
FA% was similar between cohorts (retrospective vs. prospective) on PICU days 1, 3, and 10 (median [IQR] 1.8% [0.2-4.3] vs. 1.9% [0.8-3.2], P = 0.934; 5.5% [1.7-10.3] vs. 6.1% [3.8-10.2], P = 0.565; 8.3% [0.8-24.8] vs. 7.2% [2.6-18.7], P = 0.848). By ROSE phase, FA% was comparable in Resuscitation (3.5% [2.0-6.0] vs. 4.7% [2.4-6.9], P = 0.244), Optimization (3.0% [0.1-6.7] vs. 4.2% [1.0-7.9], P = 0.261), and Evacuation (2.5% [-2.6-5.3] vs. 2.4% [-0.0-7.4], P = 0.256), but higher during Stabilization (2.5% [0.0-6.9] vs. 4.2% [2.0-8.9], P = 0.043). Mechanical ventilation, length of PICU stay, RRT, and fluid elimination were similar. No independent predictors emerged in logistic regression. FA% target adherence rose from 67.9% to 72.4% after ROSE.
Conclusions:
The ROSE framework in pediatric fluid management is feasible, provides benchmarking for FA% control, and shows promise for individualizing fluid management. Future validation in ROSE-naive centers is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Oxygen Therapy for Respiratory Failure
Oxygen therapy is vital in increasing and maintaining blood oxygen levels in PAH patients. As a result, it aids in reducing fatigue,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

