Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Bone Regeneration with Vascularized Artificial Cartilage Integration
Published on: July 14, 2023
Rheological and Structural Analysis of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Used for Chin Augmentation.
Ana Claudia Carbone1, Maria Luiza Boechat Borges Neves2, André Gaspar Zinco3
1Private Practice, São Paulo, Brazil.
RESTYLANE® SHAYPE offers a balanced profile for chin augmentation, showing moderate swelling and high resistance to deformation. Product choice depends on individual patient needs and desired aesthetic outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Aesthetic Medicine
- Dermatology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are widely used for chin contouring and projection in aesthetic procedures.
- The physicochemical and viscoelastic properties of HA fillers significantly impact their clinical performance.
- Understanding these properties is crucial for optimizing aesthetic outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the properties of four HA filler gels for chin projection: JUVÉDERM® VOLUX, RESTYLANE® LYFT, PERFECTHA® SUBSKIN, and RESTYLANE® SHAYPE.
- To evaluate how variations in filler properties influence suitability for chin augmentation.
Main Methods:
- Characterization using scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, and swelling factor (SF).
- Rheological assessments including frequency sweep, amplitude sweep, and cohesivity modulus (MOC).
- All tests were conducted in triplicate for reliability.
Main Results:
- JUVÉDERM® VOLUX showed the highest swelling capacity (SF 3.28-3.37), while RESTYLANE® LYFT had the lowest (SF 1.53-1.66).
- RESTYLANE® LYFT and RESTYLANE® SHAYPE exhibited higher storage modulus (G') values, indicating greater stiffness.
- RESTYLANE® SHAYPE and PERFECTHA® SUBSKIN demonstrated higher cohesivity modulus (MOC), suggesting superior resistance to deformation.
Conclusions:
- RESTYLANE® SHAYPE presented a favorable balance of moderate swelling, high G', and elevated MOC for chin contouring.
- The selection of HA fillers should consider patient anatomy, aesthetic goals, and injector expertise.
- No single filler is universally superior; tailored selection is key for optimal results.
More Related Videos
12:22Synthesis of Thermogelling PolyN-isopropylacrylamide-graft-chondroitin Sulfate Composites with Alginate Microparticles for Tissue Engineering
Published on: October 26, 2016
12:373D Hydrogel Scaffolds for Articular Chondrocyte Culture and Cartilage Generation
Published on: October 7, 2015