Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy vs Upfront Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: A Randomized Clinical
Lars Henrik Jensen1, Monica Kjaer2,3, Laura Vittrup Diness4
1Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Importance:
Locally advanced colon cancer carries a high risk of recurrence. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been proposed to improve outcomes, but evidence from phase III trials remains limited.
Objective:
To determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) compared with upfront surgery in patients with locally advanced colon cancer.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trial conducted from October 14, 2013, to November 27, 2020, with follow-up up to 3 years for DFS took place at 9 hospitals in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. A total of 250 patients with locally advanced colon cancer staged by computed tomography, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, and no distant metastases were enrolled. These data were analyzed from January 2024 to October 2024.
Interventions:
Patients were randomized 1:1 to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy as indicated (n = 122) or 3 cycles of neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy if indicated (n = 126).
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary end point was DFS. Secondary end points included surgical and pathological outcomes, adjuvant chemotherapy use, adverse events, quality of life, and exploratory analysis by mismatch repair (MMR) status.
Results:
A total of 248 patients were eligible and included in analyses (median age, 66 [min-max, 24-84] years; 111 women [45%] and 137 men [55%]). At 3 years, DFS was 87% in the upfront surgery arm and 83% in the neoadjuvant arm (P = .36). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was feasible and safe, achieved tumor downstaging, and reduced the proportion of patients meeting criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy (upfront surgery 73% vs neoadjuvant group 59%; P = .02). Exploratory analyses suggested variation by MMR status, with DFS estimates higher after upfront surgery in patients with MMR-deficient tumors. Postoperative complications, adverse event profiles, and quality of life were comparable between groups.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve DFS compared with upfront surgery, establishing the NeoCol trial as negative. However, feasibility, safety, downstaging effects, reduced adjuvant chemotherapy use, and MMR subgroup findings add to evidence from other randomized trials supporting further evaluation of this strategy in individualized management of locally advanced colon cancer.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01918527.
More Related Videos
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
07:22Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025