Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
Published on: November 28, 2025
Modified Dixon MRI to detect subclinical inflammation in clinically suspect arthralgia as a risk factor for
Daniek van der Kaaij1,2, Stijn Claassen3, Hanna W van Steenbergen3
1Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands d.vanderkaaij@erasmusmc.nl.
Objectives:
MRI-detected subclinical inflammation in clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) predicts progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is incorporated in EULAR/ACR risk stratification criteria. Conventional MRI is hampered by long scan times, intravenous contrast and high costs, while modified Dixon (mDixon) MRI, with 5 min scan time and no intravenous contrast, is much more feasible. To optimise mDixon MRI utility, we compared bilateral versus unilateral hand analysis for detecting subclinical inflammation. We also studied the distribution of subclinical inflammation in CSA.
Methods:
139 patients of the CSA Leiden cohort were included. mDixon MRIs of bilateral wrist and metacarpophalangeal 2-5 joints were scored for subclinical inflammation (synovitis/tenosynovitis/osteitis) using RA MRI scoring. The hand with the most self-reported painful joints was used for unilateral analysis. Patients were followed for ≥6 months, with IA and RA development assessed at 6 months. We compared prognostic performance of bilateral versus unilateral MRI-detected subclinical inflammation.
Results:
Subclinical inflammation detected on bilateral MRI was more strongly associated with IA development than on unilateral MRI; 4.80 (95% CI 1.09 to 21.11) versus 2.34 (95% CI 0.84 to 6.49). Bilateral analysis resulted in a 25% higher sensitivity and 15% lower specificity, with a net 10% increase in correctly classified patients. Results for RA development were similar, with HRs of 8.17 (95% CI 1.06 to 62.86) versus 3.23 (95% CI 0.98 to 10.66), and 20% higher sensitivity. Subclinical inflammation was unilateral in 52% of patients and scanning one hand would miss a quarter of patients.
Conclusion:
Bilateral MRI of the hands is preferable to unilateral MRI for detecting subclinical inflammation in CSA, because of its asymmetrical distribution.
Insights
Bilateral modified Dixon MRI of the hands is superior for detecting subclinical inflammation in clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA), improving prediction of inflammatory arthritis (IA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) development.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Subclinical inflammation on MRI in clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) predicts progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- Modified Dixon (mDixon) MRI offers a faster, contrast-free alternative to conventional MRI for detecting inflammation.
- Optimizing mDixon MRI utility requires evaluating bilateral versus unilateral hand analysis and understanding inflammation distribution in CSA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic and prognostic performance of bilateral versus unilateral mDixon MRI for detecting subclinical inflammation in CSA.
- To investigate the distribution of subclinical inflammation in the hands of CSA patients.
Main Methods:
- 139 CSA patients underwent bilateral wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint mDixon MRI, scored for subclinical inflammation.
- Unilateral analysis used the hand with the most self-reported painful joints.
- Patients were followed for ≥6 months to assess IA and RA development, comparing prognostic performance of bilateral vs. unilateral MRI findings.
Main Results:
- Bilateral MRI showed a stronger association with IA development (HR 4.80) than unilateral MRI (HR 2.34).
- Bilateral analysis yielded 25% higher sensitivity and 20% higher sensitivity for RA development.
- Subclinical inflammation was unilateral in 52% of patients, meaning unilateral scanning would miss a quarter of affected individuals.
Conclusions:
- Bilateral hand MRI is preferable to unilateral MRI for detecting subclinical inflammation in CSA due to its asymmetrical distribution.
- Bilateral analysis improves the prediction of progression to IA and RA in CSA patients.
More Related Videos
07:15In vivo Macrophage Imaging Using MR Targeted Contrast Agent for Longitudinal Evaluation of Septic Arthritis
Published on: October 20, 2013
06:46Non-invasive In Vivo Fluorescence Optical Imaging of Inflammatory MMP Activity Using an Activatable Fluorescent Imaging Agent
Published on: May 8, 2017