Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

09:01
Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
12.5K
Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Provides Superior Stability in ACL Reconstruction With Posterolateral Tibial
Grégoire Thürig1,2, Niklas Braun3, Elmar Herbst3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
|March 5, 2026
Summary
Repairing small posterolateral tibial fractures (≤3 mm) alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) does not improve knee stability. ACLR with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) offers superior stability in ACL-deficient knees with these fractures.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic biomechanics
- Sports medicine
- Knee joint kinematics
Background:
- Posterolateral tibial fractures (PLTFs) often accompany anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures, compromising knee stability.
- The necessity of treating concomitant PLTFs in ACL-deficient knees remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To biomechanically evaluate knee kinematics in ACL-deficient states with PLTFs.
- To compare various reconstruction techniques for ACL-deficient knees with PLTFs against the native knee state.
Main Methods:
- A robotic system tested eight knees in various states: intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-deficient with PLTF, ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with PLTF, ACLR with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and PLTF, and ACLR with reconstructed PLTF.
- Simulated laxity and pivot-shift tests were performed at multiple flexion angles under constant loading.
- Anterior tibial translation (ATT), internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER) were measured.
Main Results:
- No ACLR state demonstrated significant differences in ATT compared to the native knee.
- ACLR with LET showed reduced IR, while ACLR with reconstructed PLTF showed increased IR compared to the native state.
- The simulated pivot-shift test revealed significantly higher ATT in ACLR with reconstructed PLTF compared to the native state; ACLR with LET showed no significant difference.
Conclusions:
- ACLR combined with LET provides superior anterior-posterior and rotational stability compared to ACLR alone or ACLR with PLTF repair.
- Repairing PLTFs ≤3 mm concurrently with ACLR does not enhance knee stability biomechanically.
- Current biomechanical evidence does not support repairing PLTF fragments ≤3 mm during ACLR.

