Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Psoriatic arthritis management: a comparative analysis of PANLAR, EULAR, and GRAPPA treatment recommendations
Wilson Bautista-Molano1, Daniel G Fernández-Ávila2,3, Enrique Roberto Soriano4
1Rheumatology Section, University Hospital Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, School of Medicine Universidad El Bosque, Carrera 7 Bis No. 124-56, Bogotá 110111, Colombia.
Background:
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, affecting multiple domains, including peripheral joints, axial skeleton, enthesis, dactylitis, and skin. Several multinational organizations, including European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), and Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR), have established treatment recommendations to optimize patient care. However, differences may exist in their guidelines, reflecting methodology regional differences, expert consensus, and evolving evidence.
Design And Objectives:
This review compares the treatment recommendations for PsA established by EULAR, GRAPPA, and PANLAR, highlighting similarities, differences, and challenges in achieving standardized treatment strategies worldwide.
Methods:
A comparative literature review analyzing key aspects of each guideline was performed. A systematic evaluation of the latest three multinational treatment recommendations was conducted, focusing on pharmacological and nonpharmacological management approaches. Differences in treatment sequencing, targeted therapies, and emphasis domains were examined.
Results:
While all three organizations emphasize a multidisciplinary and personalized approach to PsA treatment, some variations exist in the preferred sequencing of therapies, the role of targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and the approach to extra-musculoskeletal manifestations. PANLAR provides a regional perspective with emphasis on access constraints, EULAR integrates real-world evidence and long-term safety data, and GRAPPA emphasizes domain-based treatment.
Conclusion:
While PANLAR, EULAR, and GRAPPA guidelines align in core treatment principles, key differences persist, influencing clinical decision-making. Greater international collaboration may enhance the harmonization of treatment recommendations, ensuring optimal patient outcomes globally.
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Pericarditis III: Medical Management

