What to do when the first TNF inhibitor fails in rheumatoid arthritis: stratified expert recommendations from a scoping review and Delphi consensus
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Determination of the Relative Potency of an Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody mAb by Neutralizing TNF Using an In Vitro Bioanalytical Method
Published on: September 16, 2017
Javier Narváez1, Rosario García-Vicuña2, Jesús Tornero Molina3,4
1Department of Rheumatology (Planta 10-2), Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Feixa Llarga, s/n, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08907, Spain.
Background:
Despite widespread use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as first-line therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), up to 40% of patients fail initial treatment. Subsequent therapeutic choices remain poorly structured, with limited evidence-based guidance to inform individualized post-TNFi decision-making.
Objective:
To develop evidence-informed, profile-based recommendations to guide treatment selection after inadequate response to a first TNFi in RA, combining evidence and expert consensus.
Design:
Delphi-based consensus study informed by a PRISMA-guided scoping review (ScR) and nominal group methodology.
Methods:
A PRISMA-guided ScR of biologic and targeted synthetic biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARDs) after TNFi failure was conducted. Patient profiles were identified by a steering committee, and draft recommendations were evaluated through an anonymized Delphi process. A profile-based decision tree integrated direct and indirect evidence, with evidence strength graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine approach.
Results:
The ScR included 43 studies, mostly exploratory analyses of randomized trials. Scenarios included age ⩾65 years; failure of ⩾2 TNFi; monotherapy; rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated peptide antibody status; prominent systemic inflammation; interstitial lung disease (ILD); rheumatoid vasculitis; high cardiovascular (CV) risk or prior CV event; venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk; obesity; high infection risk; osteoporosis; nociplastic pain, depression and fatigue; prior solid cancer; hematologic cancer/lymphoproliferative disease; non-melanoma skin cancer; and pregnancy.Seventeen recommendations were formulated; 15 achieved consensus. Agreed positions included caution with JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in older patients and in those with CV/VTE risk; preference for IL-6 receptor inhibitors or JAKi for monotherapy or prominent systemic inflammation; in RA-ILD, use a b/tsDMARD with a non-TNFi mechanism; rituximab as first choice in rheumatoid vasculitis; abatacept in infection-prone patients; discouraging JAKi in prior malignancy; and TNFi as acceptable during pregnancy. Two statements did not reach consensus: preferential use of non-TNFi in obesity and heightened caution with tofacitinib in osteoporosis or fracture risk.
Conclusion:
This Delphi-validated, profile-based framework provides a practical tool to support evidence-informed clinical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management

