Belonging Without Controversy: Using Self-Determination Theory to Reframe Inclusion in Medical Education
1Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract:
Issue: Global reforms under the banner of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-and more recently, justice-oriented frameworks such as justice, equity, diversity, decolonization, indigenization, and inclusion (JEDDII)-aim to strengthen belonging in medical education, yet DEI language and governance have become politicized in some jurisdictions, exposing institutions to audits, reputational attacks, and funding risks. Evidence: Self-Determination Theory (SDT) offers an evidence-based framework centered on relatedness-the universal psychological need for authentic connection-that can complement DEI/JEDDII efforts by translating inclusive aims into observable practices and measurable learner experiences, even amid contested discourse. This article situates belonging within relatedness, synthesizes international evidence, identifies structural barriers, and proposes multilevel strategies-policy, curricular, and bedside-for cultivating relatedness. Implications: By aligning belonging with universal psychological needs and defensible educational outcomes, institutions can sustain progress and meaningfully support medical learners in ethical and enduring ways.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who...
Role-Based Identity
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

