Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Navigating Harassment as Bystanders: A Thematic Analysis of Internal Medicine Residents' Responses in
Myriam Johnson1, Byunghoon Tony Ahn, Cassandra Dutil
1From the Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Canada (M.J., B.T.A., N.M., K.G., J.M.H.); Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada (C.D.); Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada (N-Z.S.); Institute for Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montréal, Canada (N-Z.S. and J.M.H.); Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada (J.M.H.), and the Steinberg Centre for Simulation and Interactive Learning, McGill University, Montréal, Canada (J.M.H).
Introduction:
Harassment is a persistent issue in medical training, negatively impacting trainees' well-being, learning, and professional development. Although bystander intervention programs aim to address harassment, little is known about how medical residents respond in real-time situations. This study examines internal medicine (IM) residents' bystander responses during a simulation-based anti-harassment training.
Methods:
We used an interpretivist thematic analysis to address our research questions in this article as part of a larger anti-harassment research study. Seventeen IM residents watched an educational anti-harassment video and then participated in a standardized simulation of a central line procedure, where they witnessed a senior resident (SR) harassing a medical student (MS), both portrayed by actors. Video and audio recordings captured verbal and nonverbal responses, which were coded iteratively. Descriptive frequency analysis tracked response patterns over time.
Results:
All residents used all 3 main categories of responses in the following order of frequency: MS-centered (reassuring, empathetic, or knowledge driven), passive (education focused, reattribution, avoidant, or unreactive), or SR-related (immediate direct, immediate indirect, or delayed responses). All residents used both reassuring and unreactive responses. Residents' use of the 3 main response categories varied over the course of the simulation. MS-centered responses were used throughout the simulation, whereas SR-related responses only started to appear midway through the simulation.
Conclusion:
IM residents used varied intervention strategies, yet many defaulted to passive responses, potentially indicating hesitancy, uncertainty, or deference to hierarchy. These findings highlight the need for structured bystander training to build confidence in active intervention and improve responses to harassment in medical training.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bystander Effect
The Scientific Method
Obedience
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority

