Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Dilated cardiomyopathy vs. non-dilated left ventricular dysfunction: genotype-phenotype relationship and outcome
Irina Bellisario1, Alberto Aimo2, Giancarlo Todiere3
1Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Insights
Genetic mutations did not predict outcomes in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and non-dilated left ventricular dysfunction (NDLVD). Biventricular systolic function and LV filling pressure are key prognostic indicators for these non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and non-dilated left ventricular dysfunction (NDLVD) present heterogeneous genetic profiles and prognoses.
- Understanding the genotype-phenotype relationship is crucial for managing these conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between genetic mutations and clinical presentation in DCM and NDLVD patients.
- To identify prognostic factors for cardiovascular events in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Main Methods:
- Included 249 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <57% undergoing clinical, genetic, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment.
- Categorized patients into DCM or NDLVD based on LV dilation criteria, excluding other cardiac pathologies.
- Assessed a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, or defibrillator intervention, and a secondary endpoint including heart failure hospitalizations.
Main Results:
- Pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations were found in 27% of patients but showed no association with phenotype or prognosis.
- During follow-up (median 72 months), 22% experienced the primary composite event and 27% the secondary endpoint.
- Multivariate analysis identified male sex, disease duration, natriuretic peptides, non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias, LVEF, left atrial volume, and CMR-derived LV filling pressure as predictors of poor prognosis.
Conclusions:
- In non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, biventricular systolic function, left atrial volume, and CMR-derived LV filling pressure predict poor prognosis.
- Genetic mutations were not found to be significant predictors of outcome in this cohort.
Background:
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and non-dilated left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (NDLVD) comprise patients with heterogeneous genetics and prognosis. This study aimed to investigate genotype-phenotype relationship and prognosis in DCM and NDLVD.
Methods:
Patients with a comprehensive clinical, genetic and CMR assessment, with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <57% were included. Patients were categorized into DCM or NDLVD according to LV dilation (end-diastolic volume >96 ml/m2 in women, >105 ml/m2 in men). Patients with coronary artery disease, valvular, congenital, hypertrophic, inflammatory or infiltrative disease were excluded. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias or appropriate defibrillator intervention. The secondary endpoint included also heart failure hospitalizations.
Results:
The cohort included 249 patients (age 53±14 years, 166 males) with median LVEF 45% (IQ range 33-51%), divided in 143 DCM and 106 NDLVD patients. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations were present in 67 (27%), but were neither associated with phenotype, nor with prognosis. During a 72 (35-119) month follow-up, 54 patients (22%) experienced the composite event, 67 patients (27%) the secondary endpoint. At multivariate analysis, male sex, disease duration, natriuretic peptides, non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias, LVEF, left atrial volume and CMR-derived LV filling pressure predicted the primary endpoint (p<0.05). Moreover, disease duration, natriuretic peptides, non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias, right ventricular ejection fraction and CMR-derived LV filling pressure predicted the secondary endpoint (p<0.05).
Conclusions:
In this cohort of patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, biventricular systolic function, left atrial volume and CMR-derived LV filling pressure were predictors of poor prognosis, while gene mutations were not.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

