Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Management of carotid free-floating thrombus: A systematic review
Oumaima Aouam1, Carolijn J M de Bresser1, Eline S van Hattum1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Insights
Free-floating thrombus in the carotid artery (cFFT) poses a high stroke risk, with limited treatment data. Current strategies show considerable stroke or death risks, suggesting anticoagulation alone may be insufficient.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Free-floating thrombus in the carotid artery (cFFT) is a significant risk factor for stroke.
- Existing treatment guidelines for cFFT are lacking, necessitating a review of current management strategies.
- The safety and effectiveness of interventions for cFFT require thorough investigation due to high associated risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and identify existing management strategies for free-floating carotid artery thrombus (cFFT).
- To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various treatments for cFFT based on available literature.
- To provide insights for future research and standardized treatment protocols for cFFT.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase databases up to May 2025.
- Inclusion of studies reporting treatment and clinical outcomes for cFFT patients.
- Data extraction and quality assessment using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score; primary endpoints were composite death/stroke rates at short (<30 days) and long-term (>30 days) follow-up.
Main Results:
- Eleven low-quality studies involving 179 patients with cFFT were analyzed; no randomized controlled trials were identified.
- Twenty treatment strategies were identified, including antithrombotic medication (AM), endovascular treatment (EVT), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- Short-term death/stroke rates were highest with AM alone (6.7%), followed by EVT (5.0%) and CEA (2.6%). Long-term data were only available for AM (6.5% death/stroke rate).
Conclusions:
- Limited high-quality evidence exists for cFFT management, with all reviewed strategies carrying significant stroke or death risks.
- Anticoagulation alone appears insufficient, potentially challenging current guidelines, while CEA may be a more favorable surgical option.
- Findings should be interpreted cautiously due to small sample sizes, but may inform future study designs and treatment standardization for cFFT.
Objective:
A free-floating thrombus in the carotid artery (cFFT) is a high-risk vascular condition for stroke. Treatment recommendations are lacking. This systematic review aimed to identify the safety and effectiveness of existing management strategies for cFFT.
Methods:
PubMed and Embase were systematically searched from inception to May 2025, using search terms including "free-floating thrombus" and "carotid," and treatment strategies. Eligible studies reported on treatment and clinical outcomes. Two authors independently screened eligible literature and extracted data. Study quality was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score (MINORS score). Primary end points were the composite of any nonfatal stroke and all-cause death (death/stroke) at the short-term (<30 days) and long-term (>30 days) follow-up after initial treatment.
Results:
Our literature search revealed 11 studies, encompassing 179 patients with cFFT. These studies were predominantly of low quality, with a mean MINORS score of 9 for noncomparative studies and 15 for comparative studies; notably, no randomized controlled studies were identified. Twenty treatment strategies were identified, grouped as antithrombotic medication (AM; n = 120/179 [67.0%]), or AM combined with endovascular treatment (EVT) (n = 20/179 [11.2%]), carotid endarterectomy (CEA) (n = 38/179 [21.2%]), and combined EVT + CEA (n = 1/179 [0.6%]). Sequential treatments were analyzed by timing: those initiated before 30 days contributed to short-term outcomes and those thereafter to long-term outcomes. Short-term combined death/stroke rates were reportedly highest with AM alone (n = 8/120 [6.7%]), followed by EVT (n = 1/20 [5.0%]) and CEA (n = 1/38 [2.6%]). The AM group reported a short-term all-cause death rate of 5.0% (n = 6/120) and nonfatal stroke rate of 1.7% (n = 2/120). Long-term outcomes occurred solely in the AM group, yielding a death/stroke rate of 6.5% (n = 3/46), comprising two deaths (n = 2/46, 4.3%) and one stroke (n = 1/46, 2.2%).
Conclusions:
The published literature on cFFT is limited and lacks high-quality studies. This review suggests that all currently reported treatment strategies are associated with a considerable risk for stroke or death. Anticoagulation alone appears to be inadequate, thereby challenging current European Society for Vascular Surgery guideline recommendations, whereas the results for CEA suggest it may represent a more favorable option in patients amenable to surgery. These findings should be interpreted with caution given the small number of patients included. Nevertheless, our data may help to inform the design of future studies and contribute to the development of more standardized treatment strategies.
More Related Videos
13:10Combined Near-infrared Fluorescent Imaging and Micro-computed Tomography for Directly Visualizing Cerebral Thromboemboli
Published on: September 25, 2016
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care