High-dose versus standard-dose intermittent meropenem in critically ill patients: An observational cohort study
Felix Bergmann1, Marlene Prager1,2, Lena Pracher1
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Background:
The impact of high-dose versus standard-dose meropenem on outcomes in critically ill patients remains uncertain.
Methods:
We conducted an observational cohort study in Vienna, Austria, including critically ill patients treated with meropenem from March 2014 to March 2024. Eligible patients had an intensive care unit (ICU) stay of ≥3 days and received either high-dose (6 g/day) or standard-dose (3 g/day) meropenem via intermittent infusion (or equivalent doses in patients with impaired renal function). We applied 2:1 propensity score matching with covariate adjustment to adjust for confounding by indication. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, emergence of antimicrobial resistance, initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), new onset of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and length of ICU and hospital stay. Occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was evaluated as a safety endpoint.
Results:
Of 4,210 critically ill patients who received meropenem, we matched 1144 treated with high-dose intermittent infusions with 572 patients who received standard-dose therapy. The 90-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the high-dose meropenem group (adjusted risk, 31.5%; 95% CI, 28.5-34.5) compared to the standard-dose group (adjusted risk, 40.9%; 95% CI, 36.7-45.1), with an adjusted risk difference of 9.4% (95% CI, 4.8-14.1; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups, with adjusted risks for 30-day mortality (high-dose vs. standard-dose: adjusted risks, 20.0% vs. 22.2%), resistance emergence (5.0% vs. 6.2%), ECMO initiation (6.1% vs. 7.3%), and new-onset ARDS (20.8% vs. 24.9%) showing no significant differences. Adjusted mean ICU and hospital length of stay were comparable (21.5 vs. 21.4 days and 44.3 vs. 41.7 days, respectively). High-dose therapy was associated with a lower adjusted risk of AKI (60.6% vs. 68.2%).
Conclusions:
High-dose intermittent meropenem was independently associated with lower 90-day all-cause mortality compared with standard-dose therapy in critically ill patients.
Insights
High-dose meropenem significantly reduced 90-day mortality in critically ill patients compared to standard doses. This study suggests high-dose meropenem may improve survival outcomes for critically ill patients.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The optimal meropenem dosage for critically ill patients is not well-established.
- Uncertainty exists regarding the impact of high-dose versus standard-dose meropenem on patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of high-dose (6 g/day) versus standard-dose (3 g/day) meropenem.
- To evaluate the impact of meropenem dosing on 90-day mortality and other clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
Main Methods:
- Observational cohort study in Vienna, Austria (March 2014-March 2024).
- Included critically ill patients with ICU stay ≥3 days, treated with high-dose or standard-dose meropenem.
- Propensity score matching (2:1) and covariate adjustment were used to control for confounding factors.
Main Results:
- 90-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the high-dose meropenem group (31.5%) compared to the standard-dose group (40.9%).
- No significant differences were observed in 30-day mortality, resistance emergence, ECMO initiation, or ARDS onset between groups.
- High-dose therapy was associated with a lower adjusted risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).
Conclusions:
- High-dose intermittent meropenem administration is independently associated with reduced 90-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients.
- The findings suggest a potential survival benefit of high-dose meropenem in this patient population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention


