Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

A Droplet-Based Microfluidic Approach and Microsphere-PCR Amplification for Single-Stranded DNA Amplicons
Published on: November 14, 2018
Bridging policy and practice in smart clinical trials: Quantifying regulatory friction and technology adoption in
1Department of Health Technology R&D, Bureau of Health R&D and Innovation, Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea.
Objective:
Smart clinical trials integrating artificial intelligence (AI), wearable and Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, and data-driven platforms have the potential to make clinical research more efficient, inclusive, and patient-centered. However, regulatory permissiveness does not always translate into actual adoption in the real-world. This study aims to examine how national policy environments and operational factors interact to shape the uptake of digital trial technologies in Korea and the United Kingdom between 2015 and 2025.
Methods:
We analyzed 1172 interventional trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov using a multi-label classification pipeline to identify the use of AI, wearable/IoT technologies, clinical data integration, and digital platforms. Adoption patterns were linked to a policy friction index that quantified seven categories of regulatory barriers in each country. Cross-country comparisons were conducted to assess alignment between policy permissiveness and observed technology adoption.
Results:
Despite relatively high policy openness, the United Kingdom demonstrated persistently low adoption of AI, wearable/IoT, and digital platform technologies, reflecting implementation barriers such as validation burden, governance requirements, and workflow integration challenges. In contrast, Korea exhibited strong uptake of clinical data integration technologies despite higher regulatory friction, driven by institutional data infrastructures and hospital-centric ecosystems. Overall, adoption patterns diverged systematically from policy expectations in both countries.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that digital transformation in clinical research requires more than permissive policy frameworks; it depends on effective alignment among regulation, infrastructure, and implementation science. By introducing a reproducible framework that links regulatory friction to observed technology adoption, this study provides actionable insights for accelerating safe, interoperable, and scalable smart clinical trial deployment within evolving digital health ecosystems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Regulation
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

