Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
Published on: December 7, 2021
Decreasing the computing time of approximated reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values in the single-step
S N Sanchez-Sierra1, Matias Bermann1, Natascha Vukasinovic2
1Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Abstract:
The single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (ssGBLUP) along with the algorithm for proven and young (APY) are used to compute GEBV in livestock populations with extensive genomic data. Calculating GEBV reliabilities is computationally expensive, particularly with many genotyped animals, because it requires inverting the left-hand side of the mixed model equations. However, reliabilities in ssGBLUP models can be approximated by leveraging the sparse structure of the APY. The primary computational bottleneck of the algorithm lies in a matrix multiplication step, which scales quadratically with the size of the core set. This study aimed to decrease the computing time for approximating GEBV reliabilities in ssGBLUP by reducing the size of the core set in APY without compromising the precision of the reliability approximations. Reliabilities were approximated for a single-trait model for calf respiratory disease in Holsteins (h2 = 0.042). A dataset comprising 4,563,070 animals in the pedigree, 1,629,592 genotypes, and 1,585,306 records was used for the study. Core sets of varying sizes (25k, 20k, 15k, 10k, and 5k) were evaluated. Approximated reliabilities obtained with a core set size of 25k were used as a comparison benchmark. Correlations between approximated reliabilities obtained with different core sizes and the benchmark ranged from 0.94 to 1.00, whereas the intercept and slope of the regression of the benchmark reliabilities on the smaller core reliabilities ranged from -0.16 to 0.38 and from 0.64 to 1.15, respectively. Computing times varied significantly, with the fastest approximation (55.02 min) achieved using a 5k core, compared with 171.27 min for the 25k core benchmark. This represents a 3.1-fold reduction in computing time and a 2.1-fold reduction in memory usage when comparing the 25k core size with the 5k core size. Additionally, more substantial savings can be obtained as the number of traits increases. Having fewer genotyped animals in the APY core is a reasonable approach to accelerate GEBV reliability calculations; however, changes in the approximated reliabilities occur, underscoring the trade-off between computational efficiency and the accuracy of the approximations.
Related Concept Videos
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy

