Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Risk of Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection and Complications With Ureteral Stents With and Without Extraction
Nikhil V Batra1, Hannah Dillon1, Rosalia Misseri1
1Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Insights
Ureteral stents with extraction strings are safe for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty patients. These stents did not increase the risk of urinary tract infections or complications compared to internalized stents.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Robotic pyeloplasty (RALP) is a common procedure in pediatric urology.
- Postoperative ureteral stenting is frequently employed to ensure adequate healing and drainage.
- The choice between ureteral stents with extraction strings (SWES) and internalized stents can impact patient management and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ureteral stents with extraction strings (SWES) versus internalized stents in pediatric patients undergoing robotic pyeloplasty (RALP).
- To compare postoperative complication rates, including urinary tract infections (UTIs), between the two types of ureteral stents.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of all RALP procedures performed at the institution from 2012 to the present.
- Exclusion criteria included less than 60 days of follow-up, preoperative nephrostomy tubes, and redo pyeloplasty.
- Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients with SWES and internalized stents.
Main Results:
- A total of 245 pediatric patients underwent RALP, with 179 (73%) receiving SWES and 66 (27%) receiving internalized stents.
- No statistically significant differences were observed in postoperative complications (p=0.5) or urinary tract infections (p=0.6) between the SWES and internalized stent groups.
- While not statistically significant, longer operative times were noted in the internalized stent group (p=0.01).
- Non-use of antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of postoperative UTI in the SWES group (p=0.02).
Conclusions:
- Ureteral stents with extraction strings are a safe option for pediatric patients following robotic pyeloplasty.
- SWES do not appear to increase the risk of postoperative complications or urinary tract infections compared to internalized stents.
- The majority of SWES (86%) were successfully removed at home, simplifying postoperative care.
Purpose:
We sought to review our experience with the postoperative use of ureteral stents with and without extraction strings in a large series of pediatric patients following robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP).
Materials And Methods:
All RALPs at our institution from 2012 to present were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with < 60 days of follow-up, preoperative nephrostomy tubes, and redo pyeloplasty were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed.
Results:
A total of 245 patients underwent RALP: 179 (73%) patients had ureteral stents with extraction strings (SWES) and 66 (27%) had internalized stents. Groups were similar with regard to demographics and perioperative characteristics, except for longer operative times in the internalized stent group (P = .01). No statistically significant difference in postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.35-1.68, P = .5) or UTIs (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.24-2.20, P = .6) were observed between SWES compared with internalized stents. No difference in Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications was seen between groups (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.49-6.41, P = .4). Subgroup analysis did not reveal an increased risk of postoperative complications or UTI with female sex, UTI history, or circumcision status (P ≥ .16). Nonuse of antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of postoperative UTI in the SWES group (P = .02). Of patients with SWES, 21 (12%) required stent removal in the office setting, 3 (1.7%) required removal in the operating room under anesthesia, and 153 (86%) were able to remove at home.
Conclusions:
Ureteral SWES were not associated with an increased risk of postoperative UTI or complications in our series.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

