Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Ultrasensitive Detection of Biomarkers by Using a Molecular Imprinting Based Capacitive Biosensor
Published on: February 16, 2018
Biosensor-based diagnosis for infectious diseases: Nano-enabled revolution
Fathy M Elkady1, Nasir A Ibrahim2, Bahaa M Badr3
1Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boys), Al-Azhar University, P.O. Box 11884, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract:
Infectious diseases (IDs) pose a significant global health threat, exacerbated by the rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) pathogens. The conventional diagnostic methods, such as culture characteristics, microscopical examinations, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are reliable but often face challenges like long turnaround times, high costs, and demanding infrastructure and trained personnel. Alternatively, biosensor-based diagnostics have emerged as rapid, cost-effective, and sensitive options for detection of different pathogens. This review delves into the principles, structural components, and classifications of biosensors, emphasizing nano-enabled platforms tailored for diagnosis of IDs. Biosensors are typically comprising a biorecognition element, signal transducer, and data processor. These tools able to convert the molecular interactions into measurable signals through various modalities, including optical (fluorescence, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), chemiluminescence, colorimetric), electrochemical (amperometric, potentiometric, impedimetric), and mass-sensitive formats. The review systematically classifies biosensors based on transduction mechanisms (optical, electrochemical, mass-sensitive, and magnetic) and biorecognition factors, focusing on their advantages and disadvantages. Biosensors are further categorized by bioreceptor type, including aptamers, antibodies, enzymes, peptides, and whole cells, each offering distinct recognition mechanisms. The integration of nanomaterials (NMs), such as gold, silver, magnesium oxide, quantum dots (QDs), and carbon nanotubes (CNTs), enhances the nano-biosensors' sensitivity, miniaturization, and applicability. The review also highlights nano-biosensors that specifically detect the pathogens like Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), underscoring their clinical relevance and low detection limits. Ultimately, the review discusses current limitations and future pathways for innovation, including multiplexed detection, artificial intelligence (AI) integration, and improved biosensor portability. By enabling early and precise identification of resistant pathogens, nano-biosensors represent a transformative advancement in diagnostic microbiology, particularly in resource-limited settings. Overall, this review demonstrates that nano-enabled biosensors provide rapid and cost-effective options to traditional diagnostic techniques, providing crucial insights for early detection of MDR pathogens and outbreak manipulation.
Insights
Nano-enabled biosensors offer rapid, cost-effective diagnostics for infectious diseases, overcoming limitations of traditional methods. These advanced tools enable early detection of multidrug-resistant pathogens, crucial for global health.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Diagnostic Microbiology
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- Infectious diseases (IDs) present a global health challenge, intensified by rising multidrug-resistant (MDR) and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) pathogens.
- Conventional diagnostic methods (culture, PCR) are reliable but often slow, costly, and infrastructure-intensive.
- Biosensors offer a promising alternative for rapid, cost-effective, and sensitive pathogen detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the principles, components, and classifications of biosensors, with a focus on nano-enabled platforms for ID diagnosis.
- To highlight the advantages of nano-biosensors over traditional diagnostic techniques.
- To discuss current limitations and future directions in biosensor development for infectious disease diagnostics.
Main Methods:
- Systematic classification of biosensors based on transduction mechanisms (optical, electrochemical, mass-sensitive, magnetic) and bioreceptor types (aptamers, antibodies, enzymes, peptides, whole cells).
- Emphasis on the integration of nanomaterials (gold, silver, QDs, CNTs) to enhance biosensor performance.
- Review of specific nano-biosensor applications for detecting pathogens like E. coli, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa.
Main Results:
- Nano-biosensors demonstrate enhanced sensitivity, miniaturization, and applicability for ID diagnosis.
- Specific nano-biosensors show low detection limits for clinically relevant pathogens.
- Biosensors convert molecular interactions into measurable signals via optical, electrochemical, or mass-sensitive transduction.
Conclusions:
- Nano-enabled biosensors represent a significant advancement in diagnostic microbiology, offering rapid and cost-effective alternatives to traditional methods.
- Early and precise identification of resistant pathogens is achievable with nano-biosensors, aiding outbreak management, especially in resource-limited settings.
- Future innovations include multiplexed detection, AI integration, and improved biosensor portability.

