Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
Utilization of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Acute Brain Injury and Associations with Outcomes: A Post Hoc
Andrea Berardino1, Fabio Gallo1, Denise Battaglini1,2
1Department of Surgical Science and Integrated Diagnostic, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Background:
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) have been used in mechanically ventilated patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in cases of clinically significant ventilator dyssynchrony, and in patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). However, practice patterns around NMBA utilization and their impact on outcomes in acute brain injury (ABI) remain insufficiently explored.
Methods:
This study carried out a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective observational study (NCT03400904) including adult patients with ABI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12 before intubation) who required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) ≥ 24 h. Patients who received NMBA during their first week of ICU stay were propensity matched to those who did not.
Results:
Propensity score matching was performed in 1482 patients; among the matched cohort (n = 258), 33.3% (n = 86) received NMBA. NMBA utilization varied from 0% to 59.3% across countries. Multivariable regressions demonstrated associations between NMBA use and utilization of intraparenchymal ICP monitoring (odds ratio, OR 2.06; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.16-3.76), extraventricular drain placement (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.18-4.05), higher PaCO2 values (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.09), and moderate-to-severe ARDS (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.16-5.05). NMBA use was associated with lower hospital mortality (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.11-0.99) and prolonged IMV duration (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.38-1.76), but not with reintubation rates or tracheostomy placement.
Conclusions:
NMBA utilization varied widely, highlighting the need for more evidence to guide clinical practice. NMBA were most commonly used in patients with ICP monitoring or moderate-to-severe ARDS; associations with outcomes warrant further exploration in randomized controlled trials.
More Related Videos
09:49Assessing Changes in Synaptic Plasticity Using an Awake Closed-Head Injury Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: January 20, 2023
08:41Lateral Chronic Cranial Window Preparation Enables In Vivo Observation Following Distal Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Mice
Published on: December 29, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...
Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade