Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Written or drawn episodic future thinking cues improves delay discounting in children
Katelyn A Carr1, Leonard H Epstein1
1Division of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Abstract:
Most people prefer immediate to delayed rewards, even when the immediate rewards are smaller, and children have stronger preferences for immediate rewards compared to delayed rewards. Thinking about vivid, positive future events, or episodic future thinking (EFT), increases the extent to which adolescents and adults choose larger delayed rewards over smaller immediate rewards (delay discounting, DD). While EFT has improved DD in adolescents, previous methodology used auditory or written cues, relying on verbal elaboration and reading of cues to improve DD. Research on autobiographical and episodic memory has shown improvements in retention when using self-drawn images. Images and visual cues are frequently used in studies with children and research is needed to study the use of visual EFT cues as a method to improve EFT effectiveness on DD in children. Research in adults showed that both written and drawn EFT cues improved DD compared to a written episodic recent cue control group. In this study 10-13-year-old children (n = 58) were randomized to an EFT-drawing, EFT-writing or an episodic recent thinking (ERT) control drawing group and completed a DD task and a delay of gratification task for real monetary rewards. We found that both EFT drawing and EFT writing improved DD and delay of gratification for real monetary rewards. This suggests EFT is effective at improving DD in multiple modalities.
More Related Videos
05:04An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
Published on: October 4, 2018
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Counterfactual Thinking
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Framing Effects
Hindsight Biases
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition