Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Prospective Comparative Study of Functional Outcomes of Distal Extra-articular Tibia Fracture Fixed With
Faisal M Mulla1, Chandrashekar M2, Sneha Achar1
1Orthopaedics, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G. Nagara, IND.
Intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locking compression plating (LCP) offer effective treatment for extra-articular distal tibial fractures. IMN showed early advantages in reduced complications and improved function, though long-term outcomes were comparable.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Traumatology
- Bone fracture repair
Background:
- Distal tibial fractures are common but challenging due to limited soft tissue and proximity to the ankle.
- Treatment selection for extra-articular distal tibial fractures remains debated, particularly between intramedullary nailing (IMN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).
- Evaluating clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare intramedullary nailing (IMN) versus locking compression plating (LCP) for extra-articular distal tibial fractures.
- To assess and compare clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes between IMN and LCP.
- To identify procedure-specific complications associated with each surgical technique.
Main Methods:
- A prospective comparative study involving 40 patients with extra-articular distal tibial fractures from March 2022 to March 2025.
- Patients were divided into two groups: 20 treated with IMN and 20 with locking compression plating (LCP).
- Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, with functional outcomes evaluated at one-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- All fractures achieved union at one year. The IMN group reported 35% excellent and 65% good outcomes, while the LCP group had 20% excellent, 60% good, 15% fair, and 5% poor outcomes.
- Complications occurred in 10% of the IMN group (superficial infections) and 20% of the LCP group (superficial/deep infections, persistent soreness).
- No malunion or nonunion was observed in either group, with comparable long-term functional results.
Conclusions:
- Both IMN and LCP provide favorable long-term results for extra-articular distal tibial fractures.
- IMN demonstrated advantages in shorter operative times, fewer complications, and better early functional outcomes compared to LCP.
- Further extensive research with longer follow-up periods is warranted to confirm these findings.
More Related Videos
07:41An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016
05:34A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats
Published on: May 20, 2019