Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
Cost-effectiveness of personalized medical treatment in acromegaly: a post hoc analysis of the ACROFAST study
Montserrat Marques-Pamies1, Laura Ricou2, Joan Gil3,4,5
1Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital General de Granollers, 08402 Granollers, Spain.
Context:
Medical treatment of acromegaly is currently performed through a trial-and-error approach using first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs) as first-line drugs, with an efficacy of 50%. Some biomarkers can predict patient response, potentially benefiting nonresponders by using personalized treatment approaches. The ACROFAST study revealed that the probability of disease control was 2.53 times higher (CI 1.30-4.80) with personalized treatment, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) normalization occurred in 78% vs 53% of patients, compared with standard treatment (P < .05).
Objective:
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of personalized medicine based on predictive biomarkers, from the results of the ACROFAST study.
Methods:
Post hoc analysis from the ACROFAST study comparing cost-effectiveness of a protocol of medical treatment based on predictive biomarkers to fgSRLs (n = 32) vs standard treatment (n = 36) for 12 months. Costs analyzed were visits, examinations, study of biomarkers (121€/patient), and pharmacological treatment according to the prices established by the Spanish National Health Care System. Medium-term costs were evaluated, considering a projection of up to 2 years in uncontrolled cases, assuming positive and negative scenarios with additional monitoring costs and a 25% likelihood of disease progression per follow-up visit.
Results:
The personalized protocol reduced the average cost per patient required to achieve disease control by 22% (15 127€ vs 19 420€). These results represent an annual saving of 15 263€ per patient achieving hormonal control compared to the standard treatment.
Conclusion:
Personalized medicine, using a relatively straightforward biomarker-based protocol, enables a greater proportion of patients to attain hormonal control and proves to be a cost-effective strategy for managing acromegaly.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which...
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

