Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Explainable and uncertainty-aware ensemble framework with causal analysis for breast cancer detection
Muhammad Zaheer Sajid1, Muhammad Fareed Hamid2, Imran Qureshi3
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.
This study introduces an AI framework for breast cancer prediction, enhancing accuracy and trust by combining uncertainty estimation and causal explanations. The model provides reliable diagnostic insights for clinicians.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality globally, characterized by aggressive growth and metastasis.
- Current machine learning models for breast cancer diagnosis often lack robust uncertainty handling and clear explainability.
- Addressing these limitations is crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy and clinical trust.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an integrated framework for breast cancer prediction that incorporates uncertainty-aware ensemble learning and causal feature analysis.
- To enhance the interpretability and trustworthiness of machine learning models in clinical decision-making.
- To provide clinicians with clear confidence levels for predictions, reducing diagnostic errors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an ensemble of Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), random forest, and gradient boosting classifiers with integrated uncertainty estimation.
- Employed causal analysis to identify potential clinical confounders.
- Integrated multimodal explainability techniques including SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations), permutation importance, and feature attribution.
Main Results:
- Achieved high performance on two public datasets, with AUCs up to 0.99 and accuracies up to 0.98%.
- Demonstrated 100% precision for high-confidence predictions on one dataset, with no false positives.
- Causal analysis identified key confounders such as lymph node involvement, tumor size, and metastasis; fairness tests indicated balanced performance across demographic groups.
Conclusions:
- The proposed framework effectively combines uncertainty estimation and causal interpretability for accurate and trustworthy breast cancer prediction.
- The model offers clinicians transparent decision support with explicit confidence levels, enhancing reliability in clinical settings.
- This approach has the potential to significantly reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Causality in Epidemiology
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
