Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
Referral quality and justification rate in MRI for the lower back: evaluation of an intervention to reduce imaging og
Elin Kjelle1,2, Ingrid Øfsti Brandsæter1, Jan Porthun1
1Department of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway.
Abstract:
BackgroundLower back magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a common imaging procedure; however, it often has low value in patients with uncomplicated back pain. Measures to reduce low-value procedures are necessary for a sustainable imaging service.PurposeTo evaluate the outcomes of the national intervention implemented in imaging centers by assessing referral quality and justification rate of lower back MRI in private imaging centers in Norway.Material and MethodsThis study used a before-after design to assess referrals retrospectively for justification and information quality to evaluate the intervention's effect. Four radiologists and four radiographers, all experienced in the field, assessed 360 referrals, half from before and half after the intervention. Descriptive, comparative, and Kappa statistics were used to analyze the data.ResultsThe rate of justified referrals increased from 60% to 65% when comparing before and after the implementation. The rate of unjustified referrals was reduced from 24% before to 19% after. The rate of referrals that lacked information was unchanged. Further, referral quality slightly increased after the intervention; still, 88% of the referrals were considered low quality. Radiologists were stricter in their assessment of referrals compared to radiographers. The interrater agreement was moderate in justification assessment and very good in referral quality assessment.ConclusionThe intervention slightly improved referral quality and justification rate. However, with a 20% unjustified rate after the intervention, further measures are needed to increase service quality and reduce wait times.
More Related Videos
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
10:26A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI