Unveiling Endotypes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Through Multiomic Analysis: Insights Into Cardiovascular and

Tomás Cerdó1, Laurel Woodridge2, Sagrario Corrales1

  • 1Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain.

Insights

Multi-omic profiling identified distinct molecular subgroups in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). These subgroups are linked to increased cardiovascular (CV) risk and lupus nephritis (LN), aiding in precision risk stratification for SLE patients.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Metabolomics

Background:

  • Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exhibits significant clinical and molecular heterogeneity.
  • Cardiovascular (CV) complications and lupus nephritis (LN) are primary causes of morbidity and mortality in SLE patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if multi-omic profiling can identify molecular endotypes associated with CV complications and LN in SLE.
  • To explore the potential for precision risk stratification in SLE.

Main Methods:

  • Serum proteomic and metabolomic profiling of 199 SLE patients.
  • Unsupervised clustering, multi-omics factor analysis, and machine learning models were employed.
  • Validation using external cohorts and in vitro/ex vivo models.

Main Results:

  • Proteomic clustering revealed two distinct molecular subgroups (C1 and C2).
  • Cluster 1 (C1) exhibited higher rates of LN, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and inflammation markers, indicating increased CV risk.
  • Multi-omic analyses identified key metabolites (e.g., citrate) and proteins linked to leukocyte trafficking and endothelial stress, with models discriminating clusters (AUC=0.77).

Conclusions:

  • Multi-omic profiling successfully delineated molecular endotypes in SLE.
  • These endotypes integrate immune, vascular, and metabolic pathways.
  • The findings support the use of multi-omic data for precision risk stratification of SLE patients, particularly for CV risk and LN.
Abstract