Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

09:07
Dissection of Xenopus laevis Neural Crest for in vitro Explant Culture or in vivo Transplantation
Published on: March 4, 2014
13.9K
Ribosomal modifications are associated with mesenchymal fate selection in the neural crest lineage
Irina Poverennaya1, Aliia Murtazina2, Lei Li3
1Department of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nature Communications
|March 10, 2026
Summary
Ribosome assembly factors, not structural proteins, drive neural crest cell differentiation. Modifications like m¹acp³ψ are crucial for craniofacial development and impact neuroblastoma outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Biology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Neural crest cells are vital for craniofacial development, differentiating into various cell types.
- Ribosome biogenesis and function are essential for cellular processes, but their specific roles in cell fate decisions are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of ribosome-modifying factors in neural crest cell differentiation.
- To explore the link between ribosomal heterogeneity, craniofacial development, and neuroblastoma progression.
Main Methods:
- Single-cell transcriptomics (Smart-seq2) to analyze gene expression in neural crest cells.
- In vitro and in vivo experiments to disrupt key rRNA-modifying genes (NHP2, TSR3, Polr1a, Polr1c).
- Analysis of neuroblastoma patient data and cell line experiments.
Main Results:
- Mesenchymal fate commitment in neural crest cells correlates with rRNA-modifying and ribosome assembly factors, not structural ribosomal proteins.
- Disruption of NHP2 or TSR3 impairs cranial neural crest differentiation; Polr1a/Polr1c knockout leads to craniofacial malformations.
- Elevated ribosomal control proteins in neuroblastoma patients correlate with poorer outcomes, with TSR3 and WDR74 playing roles in mesenchymal-like tumor states.
Conclusions:
- Ribosome assembly and rRNA modifications are critical regulators of neural crest cell fate decisions during development.
- Ribosomal heterogeneity influences both normal craniofacial development and the progression of neuroblastoma.
- Targeting ribosomal pathways may offer therapeutic strategies for neuroblastoma.
Related Concept Videos
Determination
21.3K
During embryogenesis, cells become progressively committed to different fates through a two-step process: specification followed by determination. Specification is demonstrated by removing a segment of an early embryo, “neutrally” culturing the tissue in vitro—for example, in a petri dish with simple medium—and then observing the derivatives. If the cultured region gives rise to cell types that it would normally generate in the embryo, this means that it is specified. In...
21.3K
Neurulation
46.9K
Neurulation is the embryological process which forms the precursors of the central nervous system and occurs after gastrulation has established the three primary cell layers of the embryo: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. In humans, the majority of this system is formed via primary neurulation, in which the central portion of the ectoderm—originally appearing as a flat sheet of cells—folds upwards and inwards, sealing off to form a hollow neural tube. As development proceeds, the...
46.9K
Lineage Commitment
4.5K
Commitment is the process whereby stem cells:
4.5K
Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming
2.2K
Nuclear reprogramming is a process of transforming one cell type into an unrelated cell type by epigenetic changes that alter the cell’s original gene expression pattern. Such epigenetic changes force cells to express a different set of genes, which play a significant role in inducing transformation into other cell types. Nuclear reprogramming offers applications in reproductive cloning for livestock propagation and regenerative medicine — developing patient-specific cells for...
2.2K
Protein Modifications in the RER
7.3K
Modification of secretory and transmembrane proteins entering the rough ER begins in the ER lumen. These modifications aid in protein folding and stabilize the acquired tertiary structure. Protein modifications in the rough ER co-occur at different stages of protein folding.
Broadly, these modifications can be categorized into four main categories — glycosylation, formation of disulfide bonds, assembly of protein subunits, and specific proteolytic cleavages like removal of signal...
Broadly, these modifications can be categorized into four main categories — glycosylation, formation of disulfide bonds, assembly of protein subunits, and specific proteolytic cleavages like removal of signal...
7.3K

