Effectiveness and Safety of Different Dressing and Securement Methods for Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A...

Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are widely used in hospital settings but are associated with high failure rates and patient safety risks. Various dressing and securement methods have been implemented to mitigate these complications. This systematic review aimed to systematically review the effectiveness and safety of different dressing and securement methods for PIVCs in hospitalised adult and paediatric patients. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1959 and 2024 were identified through searches of CENTRAL, CINAHL, Ovid EMBASE, and Ovid MEDLINE. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Outcomes included PIVC failure, dislodgement, occlusion, infiltration, extravasation, phlebitis, and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), analysed using risk ratios where meta-analysis was feasible. Dwell time was reported descriptively as mean or median values. Fifteen RCTs involving 5542 participants evaluated eight PIVC dressing and securement methods. In adult populations, tissue adhesive significantly reduced PIVC failure compared with transparent polyurethane dressing (risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.95), as well as dislodgement (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.84) and occlusion (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.94). Transparent polyurethane dressing was associated with lower dislodgement rates compared with gauze in adults. Other comparisons showed no statistically significant differences or were informed by single studies only, limiting the strength of conclusions. Evidence in paediatric populations was sparse and predominantly derived from individual trials. Tissue adhesive appears effective in reducing PIVC failure and mechanical complications in adults. Its effectiveness in pediatric patients remains uncertain, highlighting the need for further adequately powered trials.