MRI-based Risk Scoring System to Predict Early Recurrence after Resection of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma 5 cm or Smaller
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience
Published on: December 4, 2023
Eun Sun Choi1, Boyeon Koo1,2, Seokhwi Kim3
1Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Background Several MRI-based models for postsurgical prediction of cancer recurrence have been proposed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but they were predominantly developed using mixed populations including large and multiple tumors, limiting their applicability in patients with small solitary HCC. Purpose To train and test an MRI-based Early Recurrence Individualized Score (MERIS) to help predict early recurrence following resection in patients with solitary HCCs 5 cm or smaller and to compare its performance with a pathologic analysis-based model and existing prognostic systems. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, patients with treatment-naive, solitary HCCs 5 cm or smaller who underwent curative resection were split into a training set and an external test set. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to predict time to early recurrence (within 2 years) based on MRI prognostic features and to train MERIS. MERIS performance was assessed using Harrell concordance index (known as the c-index) and compared with a pathologic analysis-based model and existing prognostic systems. Results A total of 325 patients (mean age, 59 years ± 9.7 [SD]; 253 men) were included (204 in training set; 121 in external test set). MERIS incorporated four features: elevated aspartate aminotransferase (hazard ratio [HR], 2.70; P = .006), tumor size (HR, 1.51; P = .01), nonsmooth tumor margin (HR, 2.12; P = .04), and peritumoral hepatobiliary phase hypointensity (HR, 2.97; P = .002). Using a MERIS cutoff of five points, 2-year recurrence-free probabilities were lower in high-risk versus low-risk groups (training set, 69.5% vs 91.4% [P < .001]; external test set, 59.3% vs 87.4% [P < .001]). MERIS demonstrated high predictive performance in both the training (c-index, 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.82) and external test (c-index, 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.84) sets. In the external test set, MERIS outperformed the pathologic analysis-based and most existing prognostic systems (all P < .03). Conclusion MERIS demonstrated superior performance in predicting early recurrence risk after resection of solitary HCC 5 cm or smaller compared with pathologic analysis-based and other prognostic systems. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018