Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
Visual search for people wearing protective clothing in a forestial environment - Differences between gaze and
Florian S Oswald1, Wolfgang Einhäuser1
1Physics of Cognition Group, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Abstract:
To prevent hunting accidents, people in forests should be well-visible to others. However, there is debate which kind of protective clothing should be required. We created a database containing photographs of 22 individuals in forestial settings. The database is available online; for the present study a subset of images was used. The photographed persons ("models") wore four different clothing variants adding to typical forest garment: Two conditions included protective clothing, either a reflective vest or a hat with reflective hatband. We included two conditions without protective clothing, either with a hat (without hatband) or with no hat, and a condition without person. For the present study, we cropped and scaled the image of the database to generate 800 stimuli (160 per condition). These were presented to N = 16 observers, who were asked to respond as quickly as possible without sacrificing accuracy whether a human was present. Reaction times (RTs) and miss rates depended on clothing. The two conditions without protective clothing had indistinguishable error rates, while fewer errors occurred with hatband, and even fewer with the vest. RTs were faster with protective clothing than without. In the absence of protective clothing, responses were faster without hat. Interestingly, vest and hatband led to indistinguishable RTs. However, individuals in vests were looked at earlier than individuals without. This difference between RTs and fixation latencies is likely explained by a frequent additional saccade from vest to face before the response, presumably to verify the human presence. In conclusion, although RTs suggest no advantage for wearing reflective vests over hatbands, error rates and eye-tracking data reveal a potentially critical safety benefit of wearing reflective vests in forestial environments. More generally, our study demonstrates the benefit of combining eye-tracking data with behavioral measures using a real-world example.
More Related Videos
08:25Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
Published on: May 7, 2019
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Personal Protective Equipment
Naturalistic Observations
Non-Verbal Cues