Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026
A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Tunneled peripherally inserted central catheter versus non-tunneled and its effects in clinical outcomes: A
Rodrigo do Nascimento Ceratti1, Knut Taxbro2,3, Vineet Chopra4
1Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Vascular Access Program, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Background:
The use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) has increased due to its benefits, such as greater durability, safety, comfort, and cost-effectiveness. Technological advancements, such as catheter tip navigation systems and the use of ultrasound, have improved its quality. However, complications still occur, including infections and thrombosis, especially in oncology and intensive care patients. Studies indicate that advanced practices, technology, and specialized teams reduce these risks. New techniques, such as tunneled insertion, show potential for reducing complications, but further research with larger samples is needed to validate these findings.
Objective:
To compare the tunneling technique of PICC to non-tunneling insertion technique regarding the incidence of isolated or combined outcomes of catheter-related bloodstream infection, thrombosis, occlusion, and accidental dislodgement in the adult population within a 30-days period.
Materials And Methods:
In this randomized, parallel, multicenter clinical trial, 840 patients from three reference hospitals will be assigned to two parallel groups (conventional PICC and tunneled PICC groups) through computer-generated stratified randomization. The conventional group will undergo PICC insertion according to routine practice. In the tunneled PICC group, an additional subcutaneous tunneling procedure will be performed. Patients will be followed until PICC removal for any reason or 30 days after insertion, whichever occurs first. The primary outcome is to assess whether subcutaneous tunneling reduces the rate of isolated or combined adverse events (infection, thrombosis, obstruction, and dislodgement) compared to the conventional method.
Discussion:
Subcutaneous tunneling is a widely used method to reduce complications associated with catheters. However, its application in PICC has not yet been extensively explored, especially in Brazil. A randomized clinical trial is necessary to objectively assess the effects of subcutaneous tunneling in PICC insertion. This protocol aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness of this technique in reducing complications.
Trial Registration:
Clinical Trials platform NCT06365528.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:12What is an Experiment?
01:13Controls in Experiments
01:13Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
01:16Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
01:11Blinding
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...