Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
Published on: February 6, 2020
Breast Implant Illness: Are We Measuring What Matters? A Systematic Review of Symptom Variability and the Impact of
Johanna Petritsch1, Sebastian P Nischwitz2,3, Judith C Holzer-Geissler2
1Research Unit Digital Surgery, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Background:
Breast Implant Illness (BII) refers to a wide range of symptoms reported by women with breast implants. Its underlying etiopathology remains unclear, and it is not officially recognized as a medical diagnosis, resulting in divergent perspectives among clinicians and patients. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of symptoms associated with BII and highlights the influence of methodology on the reported spectrum.
Methods Material:
Multiple electronic databases were searched using the term "Breast Implant Illness". Of 871 identified studies, 23 were included in the qualitative analysis. From these, 19 were used to conduct a quantitative trend analysis of the "Top 20 BII-symptoms surveyed" and the "Top 20 BII-symptoms reported", along with their distribution across organ systems. In addition, the specific tools and strategies used for symptom collection were analyzed.
Results:
A total of 98 symptoms were identified. "Fatigue" was most frequently reported, followed by "arthralgia/joint pain" and "myalgia/muscle pain". Symptoms affecting the nervous system and sensory organs predominated. Substantial methodological variability was observed, with only four studies using standardized questionnaires.
Conclusion:
The extensive range of symptoms reflects not only clinical heterogeneity but also methodological inconsistencies. The frequent presence of secondary diagnoses further complicates attribution to implants. A way forward includes the use of standardized, validated questionnaires and instruments addressing psychological domains, administered at predefined time points. Achieving international consensus on such tools is crucial to minimize bias, improve comparability, and enable prospective studies to clarify causal links and support the recognition of BII as a distinct clinical entity.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System I: Health History
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System II: Inspection and Palpation
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

