Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018
Transparent reporting is central to reproducible radiological AI research: A call to action
Samuel J White1, Kasper L Yaxley2, Minh-Son To3
1Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Dentistry and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Health, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in radiology research and practice, yet concerns about the reproducibility of AI studies remain a key barrier to regulatory acceptance and clinical translation. Transparent reporting across the analytic pipeline is essential for independent verification, evidence synthesis, and safe implementation.
Purpose:
To examine major barriers to transparent reporting in radiological AI research and propose practical solutions to strengthen reproducibility.
Results:
We identify four interrelated challenges undermining reporting quality. First, reporting is often treated as a final-stage manuscript requirement rather than a prospectively embedded component of study design, leading to loss of methodological detail. Second, inconsistent operationalization of reporting standards by journals and funders makes it difficult to assess reporting completeness. Third, fragmentation and overlapping complexity of AI-specific reporting guidelines increase interpretive burden for authors and reviews and contribute to heterogeneity in reporting. Fourth, limited availability and usability of data and code restrict independent verification, even when resources are nominally shared. These issues are amplified by the methodological complexity and heterogeneity of radiological AI pipelines. For each challenge, we outline actionable strategies including prospective documentation of methods, mandatory and consistently applied reporting standards, harmonized reporting principles, and clearer requirements for data and code availability with structured alternatives when sharing is constrained.
Conclusions:
Strengthening transparent reporting is a prerequisite for reproducible and clinically translatable radiological AI research. Embedding reporting within study design, aligning stakeholder expectations, and improving access to reproducibility-enabling resources are essential to enhance credibility, facilitate independent evaluation, and support safe clinical implementation of AI in radiology.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...

