Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
Empirical evaluation of variability and multi-institutional generalizability of deep learning survival models:
Brennan Flannery1, Thomas DeSilvio1, Mohsen Hariri2
1Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Abstract:
Deep learning survival (DLS) modeling has shown significant promise across multiple disease conditions for predicting patient outcomes via biomedical data, but remain relatively under-explored in conjunction with medical imaging. This poses the question of what methodological choices promote model generalization, especially when predicting continuous survival outcomes in external validation cohorts. In this work, we systematically examined the impact of data partitioning, data order, model initialization, and augmentation strategies on the generalization of CT-based DLS survival models in renal cancers. A multi-institutional CT cohort was assembled, leveraging public repositories such as TCGA-KIRC, TCGA-KICH, TCGA-KIRP, and KITS19; totaling 525 patients from across 9 institutions. A 3D ResNet-18 model was trained to predict overall patient survival with a Cox loss function and evaluated across three controlled experiments: (i) random versus covariate-balanced data partitioning, (ii) randomizing vs fixing data ordering and initial model weights, and (iii) varying intensity, spatial, and noise based augmentations; evaluated in terms of concordance index (c-index) and hazard ratio (HR). Intelligent covariate-balanced data partitioning demonstrated optimal performance on an external validation set (c-index 0.74, HR 5.08) compared to random partitioning (c-index 0.56, HR 0.29). Different model initializations significantly impacted the average performance and variance across replicate trainings, while data ordering had little to no effect. Combining multiple augmentations produced the best performance on external validation (c-index +4.76%, HR +44.39%) compared to no augmentations, while most impactful individual augmentation type was additive gaussian noise (c-index +3.17%, HR +23.47%). Our results demonstrate that careful selection of strategies for data partitioning and ordering, weight initialization, and image augmentation are critical for developing robust and generalizable DL models for continuous survival prediction using medical imaging data.