Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Development and Evaluation of a Generative AI Chatbot for Database Searching in Systematic Review
Wai San Wilson Tam1, Neo Tung2, Shi Xuan Lee1
1Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Introduction:
Systematic reviews (SRs) require comprehensive, reproducible searches, yet developing search strategies is resource-intensive and demands specialized expertise. Generative AI offers potential to streamline this process, but empirical evaluations for GAI-assisted SR searching remain scarce. The objectives of this study are to: demonstrate a step-by-step process for developing a custom ChatGPT-based chatbot to support SR search strategy development, and evaluate its performance.
Design:
A cross-sectional evaluation study.
Methods:
We used ChatGPT-4.0 to create a chatbot designed to mimic a medical librarian, generating PICO-informed searches. Its knowledge base was augmented with two methodological references. After piloting testing, we refined its instructions. For evaluation, we randomly sampled 50 Cochrane SRs published in 2024. Standardized P-I-O prompts produced database-ready queries for PUBMED and EMBASE. The primary outcome was per-review success rate, summarized by median and inter-quartile range. A sensitivity analysis was conducted.
Results:
Pilot testing achieved a retrieval rate of 41/49 (83.7%). In the main sample (1169 studies; median 13.5 studies per SR), the chatbot identified a median of 67.4% of included studies (IQR: 43.1%-88.4%). When limited to indexed studies (n = 1114), retrieval rose to 72.0% (IQR: 46.0%-92.5%). Lower performance was observed when outcomes were absent from the abstracts or interventions had many lexical variants.
Conclusions:
A GAI-based chatbot can rapidly generate SR searches (~67%-72% identification), serving as a useful starting point but not a replacement for expert-led approaches. Integration of librarian expertise, structured prompts, and controlled vocabularies may improve performance. Further benchmarking and transparent reporting are needed to guide adoption.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
07:14Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
Published on: December 23, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...