Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
Ranking-based sanctions for retraction-afflicted elite researchers
Shaoxiong Brian Xu1,2, Guangwei Hu2
1School of Foreign Studies, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang, China.
Background:
The 2024 Stanford career-long list of the world's top 2% scientists (WTSs) by citation impact, which for the first time includes retraction data, offers a unique opportunity to explore research integrity within this group of elite researchers.
Methods:
This study examines the retraction data across multiple dimensions, including countries/regions, institutions, research domains, fields, and subfields, using three key metrics: the prevalence of WTSs with retractions, the retraction rate, and the citation rate of retracted publications.
Results:
Our analysis reveals significant variations in these retraction metrics by country/region income level, level of seniority in academic publishing, and research domain. Significant differences were also observed between China and the USA. Based on these findings, we argue that elite researchers should be held accountable and sanctioned for their retractions. Accordingly, we propose a ranking-based sanction framework for identifying and ranking WTSs with retractions, and this framework is applied to the 2024 Stanford career-long list to illustrate its practical applicability.
Conclusion:
We discuss the findings and their implications for addressing retractions among elite researchers, as well as strategies for refining the ranking-based sanction framework.
Related Concept Videos
Ranks
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Ethics in Research
Regulated Protein Degradation
Protein degradation plays two important roles in the cells. It helps to protect cells from misfolded or damaged proteins before they lead to a...
Regulated Protein Degradation
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
