Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Children: A 14-Year Population-Based Study
Marko Bjeloševič1,2, Peter Olejník1,3, Jaroslav Tomko2
1Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine Comenius University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovakia.
Pediatric implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use shows significant complications, especially for primary prevention. Newer subcutaneous (S-ICD) and extravascular (EV-ICD) systems offer promising, less invasive alternatives for children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in children, particularly for primary prevention, has limited data, especially from less affluent regions.
- The increasing adoption of fully subcutaneous (S-ICD) and extravascular (EV-ICD) systems necessitates analysis of their use in pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the epidemiology, indications, complications, and outcomes of pediatric ICD recipients at a tertiary center.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different ICD system types in children.
- To assess the challenges in primary prevention risk stratification for pediatric ICD implantation.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, population-based, nationwide, single-center study analyzing medical records from 2012 to 2025.
- Inclusion of patients aged 0-18 years who underwent ICD implantation.
- Kaplan-Meier analyses for shock-free and mortality endpoints.
Main Results:
- Forty-nine pediatric patients were included, with an estimated national incidence of 1 ICD implantation per 22,000 live births.
- ICDs were primarily for secondary prevention (80%), with Long QT syndrome and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as common diagnoses.
- Appropriate shocks occurred in 27% of secondary prevention patients; no appropriate therapies were seen in primary prevention despite higher mortality. Inappropriate shocks affected 22%, and major device complications occurred in 17%.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric ICD therapy is associated with significant device-related morbidity and challenges in primary prevention risk stratification.
- Emerging S-ICD and EV-ICD systems show promise as less invasive alternatives for selected pediatric patients.
- Further research is needed to optimize ICD therapy and risk stratification in pediatric populations.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies

