Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 17, 2011
A Pragmatic Framework for Federated Learning Risk and Governance in Academic Medical Centers
Daniel Bottomly1, Bridget Barnes2, Kuli Mavuwa2
1OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, 3485 S Bond Ave, Portland, OR, 97239, United States, 1 503-494-8311.
Unlabelled:
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models, there is growing interest in adopting AI approaches within academic medical centers (AMCs). However, the vast amounts of data required for AI and the sensitive nature of medical information pose significant challenges to developing high-performing models at individual institutions. Furthermore, recent changes in government funding priorities may result in the decentralization of biomedical data repositories that risk creating significant barriers to effective data sharing and robust model development. This has generated significant interest in federated learning (FL), which enables collaborative model training without transferring data between institutions, thereby enhancing the protection of proprietary and sensitive information. While FL offers a crucial pathway to enable multi-institutional AI development while maintaining data privacy, it also exposes AMCs to novel governance, security, and operational risks that are not fully addressed by existing procedures. In response, this manuscript provides a perspective grounded in both leading international standards (NIST AI RMF [National Institute of Standards and Technology Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework], International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 42001) and in the real-world governance experience of AMC leadership. We present a risk differentiation framework, an FL risk matrix, and a set of essential governance artifacts-each mapped to key institutional challenges and reviewed for alignment with core standards but offered as pragmatic, illustrative guides rather than prescriptive checklists. Together, these tools represent a novel resource to support AMC security, privacy, and governance leaders with standards-informed, context-sensitive tools for addressing the evolving risks of FL in biomedical research and clinical environments.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Healthcare Agencies I
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

