Structured Interdisciplinary Rounds and Hospital Outcomes in a Southeastern U.S. Health System: A Retrospective
Thad Wilkins1, Anthony Daniels2, David W Walsh2
1Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. jwilkins@augusta.edu.
Background:
Structured Interdisciplinary Rounds (SIDRs) aim to improve communication, care coordination, and discharge planning by bringing multidisciplinary teams together for structured bedside discussions. Although widely promoted, few multisite evaluations have assessed their association with key hospital performance metrics compared with traditional rounding models.
Objective:
To evaluate the association of SIDRs with hospital efficiency, safety, and patient experience across a multi‑hospital health system.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study comparing SIDR and traditional care units across four hospitals.
Participants:
A total of 11,334 inpatient discharges between July 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024.
Interventions:
Daily structured interdisciplinary rounds conducted by physicians, nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and rehabilitation staff.
Main Measures:
Length of stay (LOS), observed‑to‑expected LOS (O/E LOS), case mix index (CMI)‑adjusted LOS, 30‑day readmissions, safety outcomes (falls, pressure injuries, medication errors per 1000 patient‑days), patient experience (HCAHPS communication and care‑transition domains), and complaints per 1000 patient‑days.
Key Results:
SIDR units had lower O/E LOS compared with traditional units (1.35 vs 1.50; Δ - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.22 to - 0.05; p = 0.004). Unadjusted LOS was higher in SIDR units, whereas CMI‑adjusted LOS favored SIDR among moderate‑ and high‑complexity patients. Thirty‑day readmissions and patient‑experience scores did not differ significantly. Safety event rates were low in both groups, with no significant differences, although medication‑error reporting was likely under‑captured due to voluntary reporting systems. Unit‑level sensitivity analyses demonstrated site‑level heterogeneity but were directionally consistent with patient‑level findings, with risk‑adjusted advantages for SIDR most pronounced at one hospital.
Conclusions:
SIDRs were associated with lower risk‑adjusted LOS without differences in readmissions, safety events, or patient‑experience scores. Benefits were greatest among higher‑complexity patients, suggesting that structured interdisciplinary communication may be particularly impactful for patients requiring intensive coordination. Further research should incorporate broader safety indicators, process‑of‑care measures, and patient‑reported experience tools to more fully characterize the effects of SIDRs across diverse inpatient environments.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
01:20Integrated Healthcare System
01:27Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
00:59Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
01:21Tertiary Healthcare System
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...