Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Continuous Telemetric In Utero Tracheal Pressure Measurements in Fetal Lambs
Published on: December 22, 2023
Remote blood pressure telemonitoring in hypertensive pregnancies: Feasibility and preliminary outcomes from a
Tiago Filipe Aguiar1, J A Nobre Dos Santos2, Anabela Gonzaga1
1Serviço de Cardiologia, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Aveiro, Portugal.
We evaluated the feasibility and early outcomes of a prototype remote blood pressure (BP) monitoring pathway for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) implemented in a multidisciplinary clinic. In a retrospective single-centre before-after cohort, 38 consecutive women were analysed: the first 19 enrolled in telemonitoring (Group A; January-December 2024) received a validated upper-arm BP monitor, standardized technique training, and home readings submitted via a secure digital platform reviewed by clinicians; the preceding 19 (Group B) received standard in-person surveillance. Median age was 34.5 years (IQR 31.0-37.75); 34.2% were primigravida. Group A required fewer in-person consultations (2.68 ± 1.53 vs 3.84 ± 1.68; 30% relative reduction; p = 0.02). Baseline office BP and 24-hour ABPM indices were similar between groups. Group A was older (36 vs 32 years; p = 0.049) and had higher maternal-fetal risk-factor burden (2 vs 1; p = 0.009). Any maternal-fetal event occurred in 68.4% vs 63.2% (p = 0.732), while preeclampsia was more frequent in Group A (36.8% vs 5.3%; p = 0.042). Telemonitoring enabled review of BP trajectories and prompted reassessment when needed. Limitations include small sample size, retrospective design, and case-mix confounding. Overall, remote BP monitoring appeared feasible and reduced routine visits without worse BP indices or overall event rates, supporting larger controlled prospective evaluations of clinical effectiveness and implementation.
We evaluated the feasibility and early outcomes of a prototype remote blood pressure (BP) monitoring pathway for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) implemented in a multidisciplinary clinic. In a retrospective single-centre before-after cohort, 38 consecutive women were analysed: the first 19 enrolled in telemonitoring (Group A; January-December 2024) received a validated upper-arm BP monitor, standardized technique training, and home readings submitted via a secure digital platform reviewed by clinicians; the preceding 19 (Group B) received standard in-person surveillance. Median age was 34.5 years (IQR 31.0-37.75); 34.2% were primigravida. Group A required fewer in-person consultations (2.68 ± 1.53 vs 3.84 ± 1.68; 30% relative reduction; p = 0.02). Baseline office BP and 24-hour ABPM indices were similar between groups. Group A was older (36 vs 32 years; p = 0.049) and had higher maternal-fetal risk-factor burden (2 vs 1; p = 0.009). Any maternal-fetal event occurred in 68.4% vs 63.2% (p = 0.732), while preeclampsia was more frequent in Group A (36.8% vs 5.3%; p = 0.042). Telemonitoring enabled review of BP trajectories and prompted reassessment when needed. Limitations include small sample size, retrospective design, and case-mix confounding. Overall, remote BP monitoring appeared feasible and reduced routine visits without worse BP indices or overall event rates, supporting larger controlled prospective evaluations of clinical effectiveness and implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

