Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Measurement of Greenhouse Gas Flux from Agricultural Soils Using Static Chambers
Published on: August 3, 2014
Spatial and temporal distribution of subsurface nitrous oxide concentrations and surface fluxes in a clay soil under
Faezeh Parastesh1, Xiaopeng Gao1, Mario Tenuta1
1Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Abstract:
In cold-climate agriculture, spring-thaw periods dominate annual nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, yet the subsurface processes that govern these fluxes remain poorly characterized. Crucially, it remains unknown how management practices influence the depth distribution of soil N2O and its relationship to surface emissions. A field study was conducted from 2021 to 2023 on a clay soil in Southern Manitoba, Canada, to determine the effects of a fall rye cover crop and enhanced-efficiency nitrogen fertilizers (EENFs) on the spatial and temporal dynamics of N2O in the soil profile. Soil N2O concentrations at four depths (5, 15, 30, and 60 cm) were determined using silicone diffusive equilibrium samplers and compared to field-scale N2O fluxes measured with a flux-gradient micrometeorological system. During the spring thaw, soil N2O concentrations peaked at 30 cm depth, reaching 30.0-71.0 μL N2O L-1, relative to generally below 10.0 μL N2O L-1 during the post-harvest period. These results suggest increased N2O production during spring thaw was driven by increased soil moisture and temperature that stimulate microbial denitrification. Compared to the non-cover crop control fields, the cover crop fields maintained low N2O concentrations at shallow depths during the post-harvest. Compared to conventional urea, use of SuperU as EENF in 2023 reduced growing season cumulative emissions by 77% and soil N2O concentrations in the 0-15 cm layer by 25% during the growing season. Critically, no significant correlation was found between surface flux and subsurface concentration at any depth. These findings demonstrate that soil N2O dynamics are controlled by depth-specific processes modulated by management. Our study indicates that the soil profile functions as a spatially complex reactor for N2O, not merely a source. Our findings demonstrate that integrating soil profile measurements with surface flux monitoring is therefore essential for accurate emission accounting and effective mitigation.

